EFTA00016814.pdf
75.9 KB
Extraction Summary
1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
75.9 KB
Summary
An email thread from January 2020 among US Attorney's Office (SDNY) officials discussing a 'Sharing Order' related to Jeffrey Epstein's estate. The discussion focuses on accurately characterizing new materials received from estate attorneys, specifically 'trust and will documents' and 'revocations'. One official jokes about not being a 'T&E (Trusts and Estates) lawyer'.
People (1)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Redacted Senders/Recipients | USANYS Officials |
Employees of the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York discussing legal documents related to the...
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York, the organization handling the case.
|
Key Quotes (4)
"I've updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have now received."Source
EFTA00016814.pdf
Quote #1
"I've tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks."Source
EFTA00016814.pdf
Quote #2
"Remember, I’m not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to be"Source
EFTA00016814.pdf
Quote #3
"I just need to add 'revocations' throughout"Source
EFTA00016814.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,611 characters)
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>, [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:16:48 +0000
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>, [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Re: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 17:16:48 +0000
I just need to add “revocations” throughout, which I can do this afternoon, by about 3:00, and then circulate. Will
do.
do.
Sent from my iPhone
On Jan 30, 2020, at 12:05, [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]> wrote:
Just wanted to circle back on this — [Redacted], are you signed off? Is this something we could get over to Part I today or
tomorrow? Thanks
tomorrow? Thanks
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:56 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:56 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
[Redacted], is it the intent to share those? If so, I’ll just add it to every mention of each document, but if not then it’s
unnecessary. I don’t think those are substantive docs but I defer.
unnecessary. I don’t think those are substantive docs but I defer.
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 15:55
To: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Please add it in the right place and send me the order. Remember, I’m not a T&E lawyer. But you are getting to
be
be
From: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 3:22 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Cc: [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Yes, I think this document accurately describes the materials we’ve received, with just a note that it doesn’t appear to
include revocations, so to the extent those are intended to be shared, I think that word may need to be added.
include revocations, so to the extent those are intended to be shared, I think that word may need to be added.
thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
EFTA00016814
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 10:40
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein Sharing Order Part II
[Redacted] – I’ve updated the sharing order application to be one to share the additional trust and will documents we have
now received. Would you take a look when you can?
now received. Would you take a look when you can?
[Redacted] – I’ve tried to describe the various materials we have gotten from the estate attorneys over the last two weeks.
Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I’ve accurately described/characterized
the new stuff we’re looking to share?
Would you mind taking a look (or asking a paralegal to take a look) to make sure I’ve accurately described/characterized
the new stuff we’re looking to share?
Thanks,
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
EFTA00016815
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document