This document appears to be a page from an article or blog post discussing the psychological nuances of consent, abuse, and S&M dynamics. The author argues that love and desire do not equal consent and explores the thin line between consensual S&M 'altered states' and the manipulative tactics used by abusers (specifically referencing the 'reconciliation phase' of the cycle of abuse). The text references a commenter named 'FormerWildChild' on the site 'Feministe' and bears a House Oversight Committee footer, suggesting it was collected as evidence or background material.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| FormerWildChild | Commenter |
Mentioned as someone who commented at 'Feministe' regarding 'fences' that keep S&M practitioners from abuse.
|
| Unknown Author | Writer |
The 'I' in the text; writes about consent, abuse, and S&M dynamics.
|
| Unnamed Abuser | Subject of interview |
A person the author spoke to who admitted to being an abuser and compared S&M aftercare to his own 'brainwashing' tac...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Feministe |
A blog or website mentioned where 'FormerWildChild' commented.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
implied by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018662', indicating the source of the document production.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Used metaphorically ('falling into the Grand Canyon of abuse').
|
"sexual desire is not consent. And love isn't consent, either."Source
"There can be pleasure, desire, and even love existing alongside real abuse. But that doesn't mean it's not abuse."Source
"How much of an abuser's power over their victim might come from the mental malleability that cautious S&Mers learn to respect?"Source
"Those invisible fences around the canyon are constructed from self-awareness, self-esteem, respect, and consent."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,239 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document