EFTA00014131.pdf
57.3 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email chain
File Size:
57.3 KB
Summary
This document is an internal email chain dated November 4-5, 2008, among unidentified officials (likely DOJ/US Attorney's Office) discussing how to respond to a letter from attorney Edwards dated October 15, 2008. The participants discuss the risks of providing a written response that could be used in civil suits or the press, with one official proposing a minimal response stating the Office is not party to civil suits but will review evidence of any breach of Epstein's Non-Prosecution Agreement.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edwards | Attorney |
Author of an Oct 15, 2008 letter regarding Epstein; likely Brad Edwards representing victims.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of Investigation |
Mentioned as 'Mr. Epstein'; subject of a criminal investigation and Non-Prosecution Agreement.
|
| AUSA [Redacted] | Assistant United States Attorney |
Designated recipient for evidence regarding breaches of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Office |
Refers to the US Attorney's Office or DOJ, involved in the criminal investigation of Epstein.
|
Relationships (2)
Mention of 'criminal investigation of Mr. Epstein' and 'Non-Prosecution Agreement'.
Correspondence regarding potential breach of agreement; concern about letters being used in pleadings.
Key Quotes (4)
"I hate the idea of writing yet another letter that will be attached to a pleading or quoted in the paper."Source
EFTA00014131.pdf
Quote #1
"The Office is involved in the criminal investigation of Mr. Epstein and is neither a party to nor involved in any civil suits against him."Source
EFTA00014131.pdf
Quote #2
"If you have any documentary evidence that you believe establishes a breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, you can forward that evidence to AUSA [Redacted]."Source
EFTA00014131.pdf
Quote #3
"Please ensure that it is factually correct, particularly with regard to what Epstein agreed to during the negotiations."Source
EFTA00014131.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,765 characters)
From: [Redacted]
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Bcc: [Redacted]
Subject: Fw: Draft Response to Edwards' Oct 15, 2008 letter
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:19:30 +0000
Importance: Normal
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Bcc: [Redacted]
Subject: Fw: Draft Response to Edwards' Oct 15, 2008 letter
Date: Wed, 05 Nov 2008 19:19:30 +0000
Importance: Normal
What do you all think?
From: [Redacted]
To: [Redacted]
Sent: Wed Nov 05 14:08:17 2008
Subject: RE: Draft Response to Edwards' Oct 15, 2008 letter
To: [Redacted]
Sent: Wed Nov 05 14:08:17 2008
Subject: RE: Draft Response to Edwards' Oct 15, 2008 letter
[Redacted]
I am not averse to completely ignoring Edwards' October 15, 2008 letter, if that is what you would prefer.
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 10:38 AM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: Re: Draft Response to [Redacted] Oct 15, 2008 letter
Sent: Wednesday, November 05, 2008 10:38 AM
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Subject: Re: Draft Response to [Redacted] Oct 15, 2008 letter
Hi [Redacted] I am out of the office today so I can't edit the letter from my Blackberry. I hate the idea of writing yet another letter that will be attached to a pleading or quoted in the paper.
I would feel more comfortable with something that says:
Thank you for your letter. The Office is involved in the criminal investigation of Mr. Epstein and is neither a party to nor involved in any civil suits against him. If you have any documentary evidence that you believe establishes a breach of the Non-Prosecution Agreement, you can forward that evidence to AUSA [Redacted]. The Office will then conduct its own review in accordance with the terms of the Non-Prosecution Agreement.
And leave it at that. What do you all think?
From: [Redacted]
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Sent: Tue Nov 04 10:56:20 2008
Subject: Draft Response to Edwards' Oct 15, 2008 letter
To: [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]
Sent: Tue Nov 04 10:56:20 2008
Subject: Draft Response to Edwards' Oct 15, 2008 letter
[Redacted]
Attached please find my draft response to Edwards' Oct 15, 2008 letter. Please ensure that it is factually correct, particularly with regard to what Epstein agreed to during the negotiations. Thanks.
[Redacted]
EFTA00014131
EFTA00014131
<>
EFTA00014132
EFTA00014132
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document