HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020834.jpg

1.94 MB

Extraction Summary

2
People
6
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Financial/economic report presentation slide
File Size: 1.94 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a page (slide xi) from a presentation titled 'USA Inc.' produced by KPCB (Kleiner Perkins), bearing a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp. It analyzes US fiscal health, specifically focusing on the rising costs of healthcare (Affordable Care Act), Social Security, and Unemployment Insurance, alongside a chart depicting the historical rise of federal government spending as a percentage of GDP from 1790 to 2010. The text argues that without reform to entitlement programs, the US balance sheet will deteriorate significantly.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Louis Johnston Source Author
Cited in the chart source regarding historical GDP data.
Samuel H. Williamson Source Author
Cited in the chart source regarding historical GDP data.

Organizations (6)

Name Type Context
KPCB
Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers logo appears in footer.
USA Inc.
Refers to the title of the report and the United States treated as a corporate entity.
CBO
Congressional Budget Office mentioned regarding deficit reduction projections.
White House OMB
Cited as a data source for federal spending and GDP.
MeasuringWorth
Cited as a source for economic data.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT'.

Timeline (2 events)

2007-2009
Recession
USA
Early 2010
Enactment of The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act
USA

Locations (1)

Location Context
USA
Focus of the economic analysis.

Key Quotes (3)

"Regardless of the emotional debate about entitlements, fiscal reality can’t be ignored – if these programs aren’t reformed, one way or another, USA Inc.’s balance sheet will go from bad to worse."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020834.jpg
Quote #1
"In 1950, 100 workers supported six beneficiaries; today, 100 workers support 33 beneficiaries."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020834.jpg
Quote #2
"Federal Government Spending Had Risen to 24% of GDP in 2010, Up From an Average of 3% From 1790 to 1930"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020834.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,632 characters)

costs onto the private market to help subsidize lower payments from public programs. This tends to help drive a cycle of higher private market costs causing higher insurance premiums, leading to the slow erosion of private market coverage and a greater enrollment burden for government programs.
The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, enacted in early 2010, includes the biggest changes to healthcare since 1965 and will eventually expand health insurance coverage by ~10%, to 32 million new lives. Increased access likely means higher spending if healthcare costs continue to grow 2 percentage points faster than per capita income (as they have over the past 40 years). The CBO sees a potential $143B reduction in the deficit over the next 10 years, but this assumes that growth in Medicare costs will slow – an assumption the CBO admits is highly uncertain.
Unemployment Insurance and Social Security are adequately funded...for now. Their future, unfortunately, isn’t so clear.
Unemployment Insurance is cyclical and, apart from the 2007-09 recession, generally operates with a surplus. Payroll taxes kept Social Security mainly at break-even until 1975-81 when expenses began to exceed revenue. Reforms that cut average benefits by 5%, raised tax rates by 2.3%, and increased the full retirement age by 3% (to 67) restored the system’s stability for the next 25 years, but the demographic outlook is poor for its pay-as-you-go funding structure. In 1950, 100 workers supported six beneficiaries; today, 100 workers support 33 beneficiaries. Since Social Security began in 1935, American life expectancy has risen 26% (to 78), but the "retirement age" for full benefits has increased only 3%.
Regardless of the emotional debate about entitlements, fiscal reality can’t be ignored – if these programs aren’t reformed, one way or another, USA Inc.’s balance sheet will go from bad to worse.
Federal Government Spending Had Risen to 24% of GDP in 2010,
Up From an Average of 3% From 1790 to 1930
Federal Government Spending as % of GDP, 1790 – 2010
[Chart showing Federal Spending as % of GDP from 1790 to 2010]
3% Trendline Average 1790-1930
24% in 2010
Source: Federal spending per Series Y 457-465 in "Historical Statistics of the United States, Colonial Times to 1970, Part II" and per White House OMB. GDP prior to 1930 per Louis Johnston and Samuel H. Williamson, "What Was the U.S. GDP Then?" MeasuringWorth, 2010. GDP post 1930 per White House OMB. Neither federal spending nor GDP data are adjusted for inflation.
USA Inc. | Summary
KP
CB www.kpcb.com
KP
CB www.kpcb.com
USA Inc. xi
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_020834

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document