HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024998.jpg

2.17 MB

Extraction Summary

2
People
4
Organizations
4
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: News article / media clipping
File Size: 2.17 MB
Summary

A news article from 'Today's Zaman' dated September 7, 2011, discussing the release and leak of a UN report regarding the Mavi Marmara incident. The article details that the report supports Israel's legal justification for the Gaza blockade and mentions that US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asked Turkey to postpone the report's release. The document bears a House Oversight footer but contains no direct mention of Jeffrey Epstein.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Cenap Çakmak Author
Author of the article in Today's Zaman.
Hillary Clinton US Secretary of State
Asked Turkey to agree to the postponement of the announcement of the UN report to late September.

Organizations (4)

Name Type Context
Today's Zaman
Newspaper publishing the article.
UN
United Nations; creator of the report on the Mavi Marmara incident.
The New York Times
Published the leaked report before the official UN statement.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the footer 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024998'.

Timeline (2 events)

May 2010
Mavi Marmara incident / Israeli raid
Naval blockade region/Gaza
Israeli forces Mavi Marmara vessel
September 07, 2011
Publication/Leak of the UN report on the Mavi Marmara incident
Global

Locations (4)

Location Context
One of the primary nations involved in the incident and diplomatic negotiations.
One of the primary nations involved; allegedly responsible for leaking the report.
Region subject to the naval blockade discussed in the report.
US
Involved via Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's diplomatic intervention.

Relationships (2)

Hillary Clinton Diplomatic Turkey (Government)
Clinton asked Turkey to agree to the postponement of the report.
Israel Diplomatic/Subject of Report UN
Israel requested postponement; UN issued report on Israel's actions.

Key Quotes (5)

"The report, the release of which was postponed for a while at Israel's request, was published by The New York Times before an official statement was made by the relevant UN authorities."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024998.jpg
Quote #1
"Israel is allegedly responsible for the leak of the report."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024998.jpg
Quote #2
"US Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asked Turkey to agree to the postponement of the announcement of the report to late September."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024998.jpg
Quote #3
"The report is significant for two reasons: First, the report now serves as a legal justification for Israel's Gaza policy, including the naval blockade..."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024998.jpg
Quote #4
"Briefly, the report confirms and supports everything Israel has already said about the Mavi Marmara incident."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024998.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,642 characters)

2
Article 1.
Today’s Zaman
The UN's Mavi Marmara report and
Turkish foreign policy
Cenap Çakmak
07 September 2011 -- The long-awaited UN report on the Mavi
Marmara incident has been finally published. The report, the release
of which was postponed for a while at Israel's request, was published
by The New York Times before an official statement was made by the
relevant UN authorities. Israel is allegedly responsible for the leak of
the report.
Sources also say that shortly before the official deadline, US
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton asked Turkey to agree to the
postponement of the announcement of the report to late September.
But the report was leaked, likely because it became evident that the
report supports Israel's standpoint on the incident.
The report is significant for two reasons: First, the report now serves
as a legal justification for Israel's Gaza policy, including the naval
blockade as well as the raid Israeli forces carried out against the Mavi
Marmara in May 2010. Secondly, Turkey viewed the report as a
potential major asset, fortifying its case in the international arena as it
pursues a cooling foreign policy towards Israel in connection with the
Mavi Marmara incident. Apparently, however, it is no longer useful
for Turkey to prove it has been doing the right thing. After the
publication of the report, Turkey will have to expend greater effort to
justify its stance and make its position acceptable to the world.
What does the report say? Briefly, the report confirms and supports
everything Israel has already said about the Mavi Marmara incident.
To summarize its points:
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_024998

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document