HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011797.jpg

2.46 MB

Extraction Summary

7
People
2
Organizations
6
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Memoir manuscript / house oversight evidence
File Size: 2.46 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a page from Ehud Barak's memoir (or a draft thereof) recounting diplomatic discussions with President Bill Clinton regarding Middle East peace negotiations. The text details strategic considerations concerning Syria (Assad) regarding the Golan Heights and the PLO (Arafat) regarding West Bank redeployments. It highlights Barak's hesitation to reveal specific land concession percentages to Clinton, fearing leaks to Arafat, while acknowledging the historical context of the Camp David Accords.

People (7)

Name Role Context
Ehud Barak Narrator / Prime Minister of Israel
Discussing negotiation strategies with Clinton regarding Syria and Palestine.
Bill Clinton US President
Mediating discussions between Israel, Syria, and the PLO.
Hafez al-Assad President of Syria (implied)
Mentioned as a potential peace partner regarding the Golan.
Yasser Arafat PLO Leader
Mentioned regarding West Bank redeployments and peace negotiations.
Menachem Begin Former Prime Minister of Israel
Historical reference to Camp David Accords.
Anwar Sadat Former President of Egypt
Historical reference to Camp David Accords.
Jimmy Carter Former US President
Historical reference to Camp David Accords.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
PLO
Palestine Liberation Organization, led by Arafat.
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document stamp (HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011797).

Timeline (2 events)

1978 (Historical)
Camp David Accords
Camp David
Begin Sadat Carter
Late 1990s/Early 2000s
Diplomatic discussions regarding peace treaties with Syria and the PLO.
Likely Washington D.C. or Camp David

Locations (6)

Location Context
Site of historical and current peace negotiations.
Country represented by the narrator.
The Golan Heights, territory contested by Syria.
Territory discussed for redeployment.
Wye
Referring to the Wye River Memorandum/Plantation.
Referring to the Oslo Accords.

Relationships (2)

Ehud Barak Political/Diplomatic Bill Clinton
Barak expresses 'full trust' in Clinton but is cautious about sharing specific numbers.
Ehud Barak Adversarial/Negotiating Yasser Arafat
Barak discusses Arafat's intentions and negotiating tactics.

Key Quotes (3)

"“Ehud, when we get to the final redeployment and a peace deal, how much of the West Bank are you prepared to hand back?”"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011797.jpg
Quote #1
"“Right here in Camp David, Begin, Sadat and Carter couldn’t complete the process,” I pointed out."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011797.jpg
Quote #2
"In order to get the agreement at Wye, the President had signed on to a provision that the dimension of the third and final redeployment phase would be determined by Israel alone."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011797.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,758 characters)

/ BARAK / 40
talks. I did realize that, “null and void” or not, our proposals or suggestions would
not simply disappear from memory. But I felt the point of principle was essential if
Israel was going to be able to consider the kind of far-reaching concessions which
final peace deals might require.
In the end, I realized that we might simply discover that Assad, and certainly
Arafat, were not willing or ready to make peace. We might, initially at least, have
to settle for a more incremental step. “Right here in Camp David, Begin, Sadat and
Carter couldn’t complete the process,” I pointed out. “They signed a ‘framework
agreement’ and it took months of further diplomacy to reach a peace treaty. Maybe
we’ll end up doing the same.” But I told the President I was convinced that if we
didn’t try to get agreements, we’d have no way of knowing whether the will to
make peace was there on the other side. Assad, I suspected, was the more likely to
reciprocate. That was a major reason I wanted to start our efforts with him. But so
far, his true intentions had never been tested, beyond his obvious determination to
get back the Golan. Nor had Arafat’s, beyond his focus on the detail and extent of
West Bank redeployments.
President Clinton did not object to an early effort to reopen our efforts with the
Syrians. But he was worried about the effects of ignoring the already-creaking
prospects of fulfilling the promise of Oslo. If we were going to delay focusing on
that, Clinton told me, he needed to be able to assure Arafat the wait would be
worth his while. What could we give the PLO leader in return for putting off the
Wye redeployments further, he asked. And then, the real question on his mind:
“Ehud, when we get to the final redeployment and a peace deal, how much of the
West Bank are you prepared to hand back?”
I simply didn’t know at this stage. Much would depend on whether we could be
sure Arafat could or would deliver a final peace. But even if I had known, I would
have been reluctant to name a precise percentage. Though I had full trust in
President Clinton, I knew that everything he and I said would be shared with at
least a few of his closest policy aides and negotiators. Sooner or later, word would
get to Arafat. When we did begin negotiations, he’d take whatever number I gave
as a mere starting point. Still, I knew I had to signal the President that I was serious
about negotiating with Arafat when the time came. I also knew the main source of
his concern. In order to get the agreement at Wye, the President had signed on to a
provision that the dimension of the third and final redeployment phase would be
determined by Israel alone. By that stage, when we got there, Arafat would have
326
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_011797

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document