HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029266.jpg

2.1 MB

Extraction Summary

8
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email thread
File Size: 2.1 MB
Summary

An email chain dated May 3, 2016, between Jeffrey Epstein and academic Moshe Hoffman. Hoffman thanks Epstein for a previous meeting and for introducing him to 'Brockman and Ehud,' then outlines profound questions regarding the origins of moral views and aesthetic tastes (referencing evolutionary preferences for 'young curvy women'). Epstein replies briefly, suggesting Hoffman consider the 'distribution' of these traits rather than binary individual reports.

People (8)

Name Role Context
Jeffrey E. Sender/Recipient
Using email jeevacation@gmail.com; responds briefly to Hoffman's long email regarding social science questions.
Moshe Hoffman Sender/Recipient
Academic/Social Scientist sending questions to Epstein. Thanks Epstein for introductions to Brockman and Ehud.
Martin Intermediary
Mentioned as the person who told Hoffman that Epstein was interested in 'top questions' in various fields.
Brockman Associate
Person Epstein introduced Hoffman to (likely John Brockman).
Ehud Associate
Person Epstein introduced Hoffman to (likely Ehud Barak).
Trump Politician
Mentioned in the context of supporters' political views.
Bernie Politician
Mentioned in the context of supporters' political views.
Jesus Religious Figure
Mentioned in the context of beliefs ('Jesus loves you').

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
ISIS
Mentioned in comparison to the U.S. regarding cultural moral differences.
U.S.
Mentioned in comparison to ISIS regarding cultural moral differences.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029266'.

Timeline (1 events)

Prior to May 3, 2016
Meeting between Moshe Hoffman and Jeffrey Epstein 'last time [Epstein was] in town'.
Unknown ('in town')
Moshe Hoffman Jeffrey Epstein

Locations (1)

Location Context
Unspecified location where Epstein and Hoffman last met.

Relationships (4)

Jeffrey Epstein Intellectual/Professional Moshe Hoffman
Hoffman thanks Epstein for introductions to other figures and discusses academic theories with him.
Jeffrey Epstein Associate Brockman
Epstein introduced Hoffman to Brockman.
Jeffrey Epstein Associate Ehud
Epstein introduced Hoffman to Ehud.
Moshe Hoffman Associate Martin
Martin conveyed Epstein's interests to Hoffman.

Key Quotes (4)

"i think you might want to consider the distribution of these things , not the binary report of the individual"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029266.jpg
Quote #1
"Thanks again for making the time for me last time you were in town. And for your introductions to Brockman and Ehud."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029266.jpg
Quote #2
"we evolved to like young curvy women because they are the most fertile."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029266.jpg
Quote #3
"Martin mentioned that you are thinking about the top questions in various fields"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029266.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,898 characters)

From: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Sent: 5/3/2016 6:37:06 PM
To: Moshe Hoffman [REDACTED]
Subject: Re: Greetings, Thanks, and Top Five Questions for the Social Sciences (which Martin thought may interest you)
i think you might want to consider the distribution of these things , not the binary report of the individual
On Tue, May 3, 2016 at 12:51 PM, Moshe Hoffman <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Hi Jeff,
Thanks again for making the time for me last time you were in town. And for your introductions to Brockman and Ehud. I have enjoyed all the conversations and been learning a lot. Hopefully, a book or two will come out of it eventually as well. Means a lot to me.
Martin mentioned that you are thinking about the top questions in various fields and suggested I might think of some of my own and pass them on to you.
In case you are interested, I list below the five biggest questions that keep me up at night, motivate my life's work, and which I think ought to keep up every social scientist. Happy to discuss with you, if and when you are interested.
-Moshe
----
1) Where do our moral and political views come from?
The bull shit answers most people accept clearly don't fit the facts; we are not discovering moral truths through reason, and our political views are not motivated by a desire to achieve the best policy outcomes. So what does drive these beliefs? And what causes them to have the weird puzzling features they do (e.g., why is a lie of commission so much worse than a lie of omission)? And what causes them to change over time (e.g., slavery has been accepted as moral at many points in history)? And differ across cultures (e.g., ISIS versus the U.S.)? And across person and context (e.g., Trump vs. Bernie supporters)?
More generally, we believe and argue all sorts of crap (your vote can make a difference, Jesus loves you, all men are created equal). How do these beliefs and arguments work? Are they just random ideas propagated by an amorphous culture, viruses taking advantage of our own psychology for their benefit, ideas that get us to do the bidding of their cynical designers?
2) Similarly, where do our tastes come from? Like the art we like? Or the music?
Some tastes are kinda obvious. E.g., we evolved to like young curvy women because they are the most fertile. And maybe we like art that reminds us of this or of landscapes that are safe or what not. But there are many aspects of art and music (e.g. modern art, rap) that are not universally pleasing. So what makes people like these things? What properties do they need to succeed? What role does the artist or the history of the piece play in what we like? Of course, this question isn't just about art and music, but about all of our peculiar, culturally specific tastes. How does culture shape our tastes? Is it completely arbitrary or is there some logic to its influence?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_029266

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document