HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017376.jpg

1.21 MB

Extraction Summary

1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
0
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Manuscript draft / legal commentary
File Size: 1.21 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a page (289) from a draft manuscript or legal guide, dated April 2, 2012. It contains three numbered paragraphs discussing the disappointment of representing celebrities, the necessity for lawyers to navigate the 'court of public opinion,' and the constitutional tension between freedom of the press and the right to a fair trial. The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates stamp.

People (1)

Name Role Context
Unknown Author Author/Lawyer
Author of the text giving legal advice regarding celebrity cases and media relations.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Source of the document production (indicated by Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT).

Key Quotes (3)

"Celebrities will almost always disappoint you. Most are boring, banal and self-centered."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017376.jpg
Quote #1
"A good “all purpose” lawyer must learn the very different “rules” of the court of public opinion and must develop the skills with which to win in that important forum as well."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017376.jpg
Quote #2
"The First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of the press, may sometimes be in conflict with other amendments designed to guarantee a fair trial."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017376.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,518 characters)

4.2.12
WC: 191694
8. Celebrities will almost always disappoint you. Most are boring, banal and self-centered.
High profile cases are a decidedly mixed bag. If you never have a celebrity case during
your career, you haven’t missed anything.
9. Clients whether civil or criminal, are increasingly brought to trial not only before a judge
in robes and a jury of peers, but also in the “court of public opinion,” where every citizen
gets to “cast a vote” on the legal and moral aspects of the case. For some clients in the
public eye—political figures, entertainers, business moguls, even ordinary citizens—the
“verdict” rendered by the court of public opinion may be as important as the verdict of the
jury or court. But being aware of the importance of winning in the media is not enough.
A good lawyer must be prepared to face the media, where the usual rules of evidence do
not prevail. A good “all purpose” lawyer must learn the very different “rules” of the court
of public opinion and must develop the skills with which to win in that important forum as
well.
10. Despite the often distorting effect of the media on the administration of justice, the press
serves as an important check and balance on judges, prosecutors, and defense lawyers.
The First Amendment, which guarantees freedom of the press, may sometimes be in
conflict with other amendments designed to guarantee a fair trial. An appropriate balance,
difficult as it is to achieve, is essential to democratic governance.
289
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_017376

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document