HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016923.jpg

1.42 MB

Extraction Summary

2
People
5
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Biographical profile / exhibit page
File Size: 1.42 MB
Summary

This document appears to be a biographical profile or introduction page (numbered 120) regarding computer scientist Danny Hillis. It details his history at MIT, his relationship with physicist Richard Feynman, and the founding of Thinking Machines Corporation and Applied Invention. The page bears the Bates stamp HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016923, indicating it is part of the House Oversight Committee's investigation files, likely regarding Jeffrey Epstein's connections to scientists and the 'Edge' community, though Epstein is not explicitly named on this specific page.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Danny Hillis Subject
Computer scientist, entrepreneur, founder of Thinking Machines Corporation and Applied Invention.
Richard Feynman Associate/Employee
Celebrated physicist who critiqued Hillis's idea but later worked for Thinking Machines Corporation.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
MIT
Danny Hillis's undergraduate university
Computer History Museum
Location of Hillis's Tinkertoy computer
MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence Laboratory
Where Hillis was a graduate student
Thinking Machines Corporation
Company founded by Danny Hillis
Applied Invention
Latest company established by Danny Hillis

Timeline (2 events)

Early 1980s
Danny Hillis designs the Connection Machine and founds Thinking Machines Corporation.
MIT
Unknown (incorporation day)
Richard Feynman joins Thinking Machines Corporation on the day it was incorporated.
Unknown

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of the Computer History Museum

Relationships (1)

Danny Hillis Professional/Colleague Richard Feynman
Feynman worked for Hillis's company Thinking Machines Corporation after initially criticizing the idea.

Key Quotes (3)

"That is positively the dopiest idea I ever heard."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016923.jpg
Quote #1
"Our thinking machines are more than metaphors."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016923.jpg
Quote #2
"The question is not, ‘Will they be powerful enough to hurt us?’ (they will), or whether they will always act in our best interests (they won’t), but whether over the long term they can help us find our way—where we come out on the Panacea/Apocalypse continuum."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016923.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,864 characters)

While Danny Hillis was an undergraduate at MIT, he built a computer out of Tinkertoys.
It has around 10,000 wooden parts, plays tic-tac-toe, and never loses; it’s now in the
Computer History Museum, in Mountain View, California.
As a graduate student at the MIT Computer Science and Artificial Intelligence
Laboratory in the early 1980s, Danny designed a massively parallel computer with
64,000 processors. He named it the Connection Machine and founded what may have
been the first AI company—Thinking Machines Corporation—to produce and market it.
This was despite a lunch he had with Richard Feynman, at which the celebrated physicist
remarked, “That is positively the dopiest idea I ever heard.” Maybe “despite” is the
wrong word, since Feynman had a well-known predilection for playing with dopey ideas.
In the event, he showed up on the day the company was incorporated and stayed on, for
summer jobs and special assignments, to make invaluable contributions to its work.
Danny has since established a number of technology companies, of which the
latest is Applied Invention, which partners with commercial enterprises to develop
technological solutions to their most intractable problems. He holds hundreds of U.S.
patents, covering parallel computers, touch interfaces, disk arrays, forgery prevention
methods, and a slew of electronic and mechanical devices. His imagination is apparently
boundless, and here he sketches some possible scenarios that will result from our pursuit
of a better and better AI.
“Our thinking machines are more than metaphors,” he says. “The question is not,
‘Will they be powerful enough to hurt us?’ (they will), or whether they will always act in
our best interests (they won’t), but whether over the long term they can help us find our
way—where we come out on the Panacea/Apocalypse continuum.”
120
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_016923

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document