EFTA00016130.pdf
61.6 KB
Extraction Summary
7
People
4
Organizations
3
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email correspondence
File Size:
61.6 KB
Summary
This document contains an email chain from July and August 2019 regarding the case 'US v. Gatto'. Jonathan M. Albano of Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP asks other counsel if they object to him filing a copy of the Second Circuit's decision in 'Brown v. Maxwell' (a case involving Ghislaine Maxwell unsealing) with the court. The underlying email from a redacted Assistant US Attorney provides the government's opposition to a motion by Oath Inc. to intervene in the Gatto case.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jonathan M. Albano | Attorney |
Sender of the top email; Partner at Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP.
|
| Kathleen A. Slowe | Assistant |
Assistant to Jonathan M. Albano.
|
| Victoria Peng | Recipient |
Recipient of the July 22, 2019 email.
|
| Steve Haney | Recipient |
Recipient of the July 22, 2019 email.
|
| Michael Schachter | Recipient |
Recipient of the July 22, 2019 email.
|
| Mark C. Moore | Recipient |
Recipient of the July 22, 2019 email.
|
| Jon | Sender |
Sign-off name for Jonathan M. Albano.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP |
Law firm representing Jonathan M. Albano.
|
|
| Oath Inc. |
Entity filing a motion to intervene in US v. Gatto.
|
|
| United States Attorney's Office |
Southern District of New York (SDNY), sender of the July 22 email.
|
|
| Second Circuit Court |
Issued the decision in Brown v. Maxwell referenced in the email.
|
Timeline (1 events)
Locations (3)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Address for Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP.
|
|
|
Address for the United States Attorney's Office SDNY.
|
|
|
Jurisdiction for the US Attorney's Office.
|
Relationships (2)
Listed as Assistant in signature block.
Email exchange regarding US v. Gatto.
Key Quotes (2)
"Would you please let me know if you have any objection to my filing with the Court a copy of the attached decision of the Second Circuit in Brown v. Maxwell (July 3, 2019)?"Source
EFTA00016130.pdf
Quote #1
"Please find attached the Government’s opposition to Oath Inc.’s motion to intervene for the limited purpose of obtaining materials."Source
EFTA00016130.pdf
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,773 characters)
From [Redacted]
To [Redacted]
C [Redacted]
Subject: RE: US v. Gatto - Oath Inc. Motion to Intervene
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:22:13 +0000
Attachments: Brown_v_Maxwell.doc
To [Redacted]
C [Redacted]
Subject: RE: US v. Gatto - Oath Inc. Motion to Intervene
Date: Fri, 02 Aug 2019 15:22:13 +0000
Attachments: Brown_v_Maxwell.doc
Dear Counsel: Would you please let me know if you have any objection to my filing with the Court a copy of the attached decision of the Second Circuit in Brown v. Maxwell (July 3, 2019)? Thank you, and have a good weekend. Jon
Jonathan M. Albano
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
One Federal Street | Boston, MA 02110-1726
[Redacted] | www.morganlewis.com
Assistant: Kathleen A. Slowe | [Redacted] | [Redacted]
Morgan, Lewis & Bockius LLP
One Federal Street | Boston, MA 02110-1726
[Redacted] | www.morganlewis.com
Assistant: Kathleen A. Slowe | [Redacted] | [Redacted]
From: [Redacted]
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 5:17 PM
To: Albano, Jonathan M [Redacted]; Peng, Victoria [Redacted]; Steve Haney [Redacted]; Schachter, Michael [Redacted]; Moore, Mark C. [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]; [Redacted]; [Redacted] (USANYS)
Subject: US v. Gatto - Oath Inc. Motion to Intervene
Sent: Monday, July 22, 2019 5:17 PM
To: Albano, Jonathan M [Redacted]; Peng, Victoria [Redacted]; Steve Haney [Redacted]; Schachter, Michael [Redacted]; Moore, Mark C. [Redacted]
Cc: [Redacted]; [Redacted]; [Redacted] (USANYS)
Subject: US v. Gatto - Oath Inc. Motion to Intervene
[EXTERNAL EMAIL]
Counsel,
Counsel,
Please find attached the Government’s opposition to Oath Inc.’s motion to intervene for the limited purpose of obtaining materials. An unredacted version of this filing is being provided to the Court on an ex parte basis.
Best.
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
New York, NY 10007
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
United States Attorney's Office
Southern District of New York
[Redacted]
New York, NY 10007
[Redacted]
EFTA00016130
DISCLAIMER
This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and as such privileged and confidential and/or it may include attorney work product. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message.
This e-mail message is intended only for the personal use of the recipient(s) named above. This message may be an attorney-client communication and as such privileged and confidential and/or it may include attorney work product. If you are not an intended recipient, you may not review, copy or distribute this message. If you have received this communication in error, please notify us immediately by e-mail and delete the original message.
EFTA00016131
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document