EFTA00029176.pdf
30.6 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
30.6 KB
Summary
This document is an email thread from May 4, 2020, involving personnel from the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). The correspondence concerns the review and editing of a memo, with discussions about softening comments, timing the release of the edits to 'the team,' and scheduling a teleconference. There is a specific strategic discussion about whether to cut a section related to a redacted individual, citing morale and 'getting up to speed' as factors.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown (Redacted) | Sender/Recipient |
Employee at USANYS or associated legal team discussing a memo.
|
| Unknown (Redacted) | Recipient |
Identified as (USANYS) in the email header.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| USANYS |
United States Attorney for the Southern District of New York (recipient organization)
|
Relationships (1)
Sender
→
Colleagues/Legal Team
→
Recipient (USANYS)
Discussing internal memo drafts and strategy.
Key Quotes (4)
"I've gone back through the memo and softened/modified a number of my comments."Source
EFTA00029176.pdf
Quote #1
"Since we're not telling them to cut the [REDACTED] section (yet), I would be inclined to send this back now..."Source
EFTA00029176.pdf
Quote #2
"I also think it would be helpful both to morale and to getting [REDACTED] up to speed to have [REDACTED] review the memo as drafted before telling them to cut the [REDACTED] section."Source
EFTA00029176.pdf
Quote #3
"We are about to flip our edits to their memo back to them, and I want to be sure we have the teleconference with you before this memo is finalized."Source
EFTA00029176.pdf
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,114 characters)
From: [REDACTED]
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: [REDACTED]
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 14:30:40 +0000
Attachments: 2020-04-[REDACTED]+ebd.05.04.20.docx
To: [REDACTED]
Subject: RE: [REDACTED]
Date: Mon, 04 May 2020 14:30:40 +0000
Attachments: 2020-04-[REDACTED]+ebd.05.04.20.docx
I've gone back through the memo and softened/modified a number of my comments. Do you want to hold off on sending back to the team until [REDACTED] reaches out? Since we're not telling them to cut the [REDACTED] section (yet), I would be inclined to send this back now so they can start working through our comments, and then [REDACTED] can reach out later today? I also think it would be helpful both to morale and to getting [REDACTED] up to speed to have [REDACTED] review the memo as drafted before telling them to cut the [REDACTED] section.
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 10:16 AM
To: [REDACTED]; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: [REDACTED]
Sent: Monday, May 4, 2020 10:16 AM
To: [REDACTED]; [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: [REDACTED]
Hey [REDACTED] –
Are you able to reach out to the team to set something up for the next couple days? We are about to flip our edits to their memo back to them, and I want to be sure we have the teleconference with you before this memo is finalized.
Thanks!
[REDACTED]
EFTA00029176
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document