This document appears to be a printout of a blog post or personal essay discussing the ethical and practical arguments for veganism, specifically focusing on the concept of consent and animal suffering. The author admits to not being an animal lover personally but argues logically against animal cruelty. The text concludes by segueing into recipes. The document bears a 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018598' stamp, indicating it was part of a document production for a US House Oversight Committee investigation. Although the prompt asks for 'Epstein-related' data, this specific page contains no mentions of Epstein, Maxwell, or related criminal activities; the content is strictly limited to veganism.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Author (Unidentified in text) | Writer |
Writes in first person ('I') about their personal experience adopting veganism and their philosophical views on anima...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Salon |
Cited as a source that has written about animal suffering on 'humane' farms.
|
|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_018598', indicating this document was obtained during a congressional in...
|
"Of all the social-justice acts out there, I actually think veganism is one of the lowest-hanging fruit."Source
"If you care about consent, then veganism is transparently the right thing to do."Source
"when you eat meat, you're eating the murdered body of an animal who died for no reason other than your transient pleasure."Source
"calling some 'humane' farms more merciful than factory farms is like saying that being burned alive is preferable to dying in a medieval torture device."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (3,326 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document