EFTA00027291.pdf

43.9 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain
File Size: 43.9 KB
Summary

An email chain between US Attorneys regarding the retrieval and production of Epstein-related documents originating from the Bureau of Prisons (BOP). The discussion focuses on locating versions of FOIA documents without a 'translucent green watermark' for submission to the Court, with one attorney confirming they have a set previously produced to defense counsel.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Nick Recipient (USANYS)
Addressed in the initial email regarding document production.
[Redacted Sender 1] USANYS Official
Sent the reply email confirming possession of documents from BOP.
[Redacted Sender 2] Assistant United States Attorney
Sent the initial email requesting non-watermarked documents. Located in White Plains, NY.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
USANYS
United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (Sender and Recipient organization).
BOP
Bureau of Prisons (Source of the Epstein documents).
Defense Counsel
Recipients of the produced documents.

Locations (1)

Location Context
Address of the Assistant United States Attorney.

Relationships (1)

Email correspondence within USANYS regarding case documents.

Key Quotes (2)

"We requested these from the BOP, and they provided a set of documents, which we then produced to defense counsel."
Source
EFTA00027291.pdf
Quote #1
"I think it's likely that we'll need to produce documents without the translucent green marking to the Court."
Source
EFTA00027291.pdf
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,482 characters)

From: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
To: [Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>, "[Redacted] (USANYS)" <[Redacted]>
Subject: RE: Epstein Documents from BOP without Green Watermark
Date: Mon, 12 Apr 2021 15:36:15 +0000
Hi [Redacted],
We requested these from the BOP, and they provided a set of documents, which we then produced to defense counsel.
We did not do a page by page comparison between the redacted set and the unredacted set, so we can't guarantee that
they are "comprehensive." But we can provide you with what we have, assuming that there aren't any issues with us
sharing in that way.
Best,
[Redacted]
From: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Sent: Sunday, April 11, 2021 12:27 PM
To: [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>; [Redacted] (USANYS) <[Redacted]>
Subject: Epstein Documents from BOP without Green Watermark
Nick and [Redacted],
I recall that at some point you requested a version of the Epstein FOIA documents from BOP without the translucent
green watermark they put on the withheld documents. Do you have those saved down somewhere? Although the Court
has not put in a specific order yet, I think it's likely that we'll need to produce documents without the translucent green
marking to the Court. I have versions without the watermark for some of the docs, but it looks like not all. Do you have a
comprehensive set somewhere?
Thanks,
[Redacted]
Assistant United States Attorney
300 Quarropas Street
White Plains, NY 10601
Telephone: [Redacted]
EFTA00027291

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document