HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022165.jpg

2.36 MB

Extraction Summary

8
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
4
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book excerpt / congressional exhibit
File Size: 2.36 MB
Summary

This document is an excerpt from James Patterson's book (likely 'Filthy Rich') detailing the legal maneuvering between lawyer Bradley Edwards and Alan Dershowitz. It describes how Edwards briefly worked for Scott Rothstein's fraudulent firm in 2009, a fact Dershowitz later used to argue that accusations against him by Virginia Roberts were part of an extortion plot hatched by Edwards to overturn Epstein's non-prosecution agreement. The text notes that Edwards was cleared of knowledge regarding Rothstein's Ponzi scheme.

People (8)

Name Role Context
James Patterson Author
Author of the book from which this page is taken.
Scott Rothstein Lawyer / Fraudster
Ran a $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme; briefly employed Bradley Edwards.
Bradley Edwards Lawyer
Lawyer for Epstein victims; joined Rothstein's firm in April 2009 and left in November 2009; accused by Dershowitz of...
Jeffrey Epstein Financier / Offender
Subject of legal files; source of future settlement money promised to investors; signed a non-prosecution agreement.
Virginia Roberts Accuser / Victim
Added Dershowitz's name to her list of abusers; allegedly at the insistence of Edwards and Cassell.
Alan Dershowitz Lawyer / Accused
Helped work out Epstein's non-prosecution agreement; accused of abuse by Roberts; claimed he was victim of an extorti...
Paul Cassell Lawyer
Worked with Bradley Edwards; accused by Dershowitz of trying to open up Epstein's non-prosecution agreement.
Leslie Wexner Businessman
Mentioned on the right page in the context of a blackmail plot theory.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
Rothstein's firm
Law firm with offices in Florida, New York, and Venezuela; front for a Ponzi scheme.
Florida Bar
Agreed that Edwards had no knowledge of Rothstein's Ponzi scheme.
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the footer stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022165'.

Timeline (3 events)

April 2009
Bradley Edwards joins Rothstein's firm.
Rothstein's firm
November 2009
Bradley Edwards leaves Rothstein's firm upon discovering the scheme.
Rothstein's firm
Undated
Dershowitz negotiates Epstein's confidential non-prosecution agreement.
Unknown

Locations (3)

Location Context
Location of Rothstein's firm offices.
Location of Rothstein's firm offices.
Location of Rothstein's firm offices.

Relationships (4)

Bradley Edwards Employment Scott Rothstein
In April of 2009, Bradley Edwards joined Rothstein's firm.
Alan Dershowitz Legal Counsel Jeffrey Epstein
Dershowitz had helped to work out Epstein's confidential non-prosecution agreement
Virginia Roberts Accuser/Accused Alan Dershowitz
Virginia Roberts added Dershowitz's name to the list of men she claimed had abused her.
Alan Dershowitz Adversarial Bradley Edwards
According to Dershowitz, he'd been pulled into a billion-dollar extortion plot Edwards had hatched.

Key Quotes (4)

"Edwards and Rothstein both say that Edwards had no knowledge whatsoever of the Ponzi scheme."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022165.jpg
Quote #1
"According to Dershowitz, he'd been pulled into a billion-dollar extortion plot Edwards had hatched."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022165.jpg
Quote #2
"Dershowitz claimed, Edwards and Cassell were trying to "open up" that agreement."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022165.jpg
Quote #3
"It might have been a Hail Mary pass on the part of Alan Dershowitz."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022165.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,504 characters)

JAMES PATTERSON
Association. By all outward appearances, he could afford it: sev-
enty lawyers worked in his firm, which had offices in Florida,
New York, and Venezuela. But Rothstein's millions actually
came from a $1.2 billion Ponzi scheme he'd been running since
2005.
In April of 2009, Bradley Edwards joined Rothstein's firm.
The lawyer brought his papers along, and Rothstein showed
those pertaining to Epstein to potential investors. In exchange
for a lump sum up front, Rothstein said, investors would receive
a far larger chunk of money later, which Epstein would pay in
future settlements.
Edwards and Rothstein both say that Edwards had no knowl-
edge whatsoever of the Ponzi scheme. (Prosecutors, and the
Florida Bar, agree.) Edwards left as soon as he caught wind of the
scheme, in November of 2009. But the few months he spent in
Rothstein's company gave Dershowitz the opening he needed to
pry open Virginia Roberts's accusations.
It was at Edwards's insistence, Dershowitz would say, as well
as Paul Cassell's, that Virginia Roberts added Dershowitz's name
to the list of men she claimed had abused her.
According to Dershowitz, he'd been pulled into a billion-dollar
extortion plot Edwards had hatched. And for Edwards and Cas-
sell, there had been a secondary benefit: Dershowitz had helped
to work out Epstein's confidential non-prosecution agreement
with the government. By implicating him directly in Epstein's
abuse of underage women, Dershowitz claimed, Edwards and
Cassell were trying to "open up" that agreement.
It might have been a Hail Mary pass on the part of Alan
Dershowitz.
But the argument had its own internal logic.
268
[Right Page - Text partially cut off at right margin]
The idea that Bradley Edw
blackmail Leslie Wexner—
no less—sounds highly ir
that Edwards had worked
running his own billion-do
Edwards may not have
files on Jeffrey Epstein a
Edwards's proximity to Roth
been as damaging as Dersh
but it was damaging noneth
he needed to make his argu
argument was that it wasn't
plot to blackmail Wexner. I
after was the idea that a l
non-prosecution agreement w
erts. That would give Edwa
agreement open. And in tha
pressuring Virginia Roberts t
Perhaps it wasn't, in this
felt reluctant to mention De
matter of the three hundred
she would stand to gain. An
that goes to set up a charity
Dershowitz had thrown out
genius move on Edwards's pa
whole psychological picture
for lying about Dershowitz, s
battered women she'd end up
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_022165

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document