Page 309 of a manuscript or book discussing the economics of intellectual property (contrasting the USA and Europe) and the evolutionary origins of human creativity. The text cites Roger Penrose and David Deutsch to explore why creativity evolved, concluding with the author's own view on problem-solving and a section on the limitations of 'Computer Creativity.' The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates number, indicating it was collected as evidence, likely in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation given the context of scientific discourse often associated with his circle.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Roger Penrose | Cited Expert |
Referenced regarding his theories on the evolution of mathematical creativity.
|
| David Deutsch | Cited Expert |
Referenced regarding his theories on creativity as a communication tool between humans.
|
| The Author | Writer |
Unidentified in this specific page, but writes in first person ('It's my view', 'I have argued').
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| House Oversight Committee |
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015999'.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Described as the unassailed leader in intellectual property protection.
|
|
|
Mentioned regarding its patent system struggles.
|
|
|
Mentioned as rapidly catching up in intellectual property protection.
|
|
|
Referenced in the context of ancient history and mathematical creativity.
|
"Societies with the best protection of intellectual property are often the most successful."Source
"Poor old Europeans have struggled with an almost unworkable patent system for nearly 30 years"Source
"We are unable to download a detailed thought and put it on a memory stick."Source
"It’s my view we evolved creativity to deal with new situations and puzzles in our daily lives."Source
"I have argued that computers cannot be creative above the logic limit"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,422 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document