HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015999.jpg

1.59 MB

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
4
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Book page / manuscript page (evidence document)
File Size: 1.59 MB
Summary

Page 309 of a manuscript or book discussing the economics of intellectual property (contrasting the USA and Europe) and the evolutionary origins of human creativity. The text cites Roger Penrose and David Deutsch to explore why creativity evolved, concluding with the author's own view on problem-solving and a section on the limitations of 'Computer Creativity.' The document bears a House Oversight Committee Bates number, indicating it was collected as evidence, likely in the Jeffrey Epstein investigation given the context of scientific discourse often associated with his circle.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Roger Penrose Cited Expert
Referenced regarding his theories on the evolution of mathematical creativity.
David Deutsch Cited Expert
Referenced regarding his theories on creativity as a communication tool between humans.
The Author Writer
Unidentified in this specific page, but writes in first person ('It's my view', 'I have argued').

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
House Oversight Committee
Implied by the Bates stamp 'HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015999'.

Timeline (2 events)

1960s
Historical reference to the ease of finding mechanical jobs during this decade.
General
2013
Implementation of a genuine Europe-wide patent system.
Europe

Locations (4)

Location Context
USA
Described as the unassailed leader in intellectual property protection.
Mentioned regarding its patent system struggles.
Mentioned as rapidly catching up in intellectual property protection.
Referenced in the context of ancient history and mathematical creativity.

Relationships (2)

Author Intellectual Reference Roger Penrose
Author discusses Penrose's views on evolution.
Author Intellectual Reference David Deutsch
Author discusses Deutsch's views on the development of creativity.

Key Quotes (5)

"Societies with the best protection of intellectual property are often the most successful."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015999.jpg
Quote #1
"Poor old Europeans have struggled with an almost unworkable patent system for nearly 30 years"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015999.jpg
Quote #2
"We are unable to download a detailed thought and put it on a memory stick."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015999.jpg
Quote #3
"It’s my view we evolved creativity to deal with new situations and puzzles in our daily lives."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015999.jpg
Quote #4
"I have argued that computers cannot be creative above the logic limit"
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015999.jpg
Quote #5

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,422 characters)

Creativity 309
ideas through patents, copyright, and trade secret is big business and combines to form the practice of ‘intellectual property’. Societies with the best protection of intellectual property are often the most successful. The USA is the unassailed leader, with Asian countries rapidly catching up. Poor old Europeans have struggled with an almost unworkable patent system for nearly 30 years; a genuine Europe-wide patent only came into effect in 2013.
Creativity in the economy is now extremely important, and nothing emphasizes the point more than the job market. During the 60s finding a job was easy. There was an almost unlimited range of mechanical jobs on offer. In the post-industrial age, almost all the mechanical jobs have gone. Today we need to be experts in a field, able to solve problems creatively. You can’t expect to walk into a job and be profitably productive on the first day. Finding a job is harder and the cost of employing someone is greater.
Why did we Evolve Creativity?
Roger Penrose wonders why mathematical creativity evolved in humans since it only became useful in ancient Greece a few thousand years ago. He believes it must have been useful for something before this. But what?
David Deutsch thinks creativity developed to allow one human to understand the thoughts of a fellow human being. We can’t precisely communicate the ‘programs’ we run in our heads. We are unable to download a detailed thought and put it on a memory stick. He thinks our creative capacity developed to help us pass skills from one to another. The ability to paint and sculpt is an accidental by-product of this adaption.
It’s my view we evolved creativity to deal with new situations and puzzles in our daily lives. We use creative thought processes and ingenuity to come up with novel solutions for when we can’t rely on programming or a store of rules. Otherwise, the very first unforeseen situation could kill us!
Computer Creativity
Humans find creativity difficult. It requires peace and quiet, detailed study and input of caffeine. How does a computer fare? I have argued that computers cannot be creative above the logic limit, so this does not preclude them from creating within the narrow confines of a particular solution space. But a human still needs to set the rules for this space. The level of creativity we should see from computers is convincing within
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_015999

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document