This court transcript from August 10, 2022, captures the moment attorney Ms. Sternheim proffers Professor Elizabeth Loftus as an expert witness on memory science. After the court overrules an objection from Ms. Pomerantz and accepts Loftus as an expert, she begins her testimony by explaining to the jury that human memory is a complex, multi-stage process and not a simple recording device.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. STERNHEIM | Attorney |
Attorney conducting the direct examination of the expert witness.
|
| Professor Elizabeth Loftus | Expert Witness / Professor |
Proffered as an expert in memory science and begins her testimony. Also referred to as 'THE WITNESS'.
|
| Judge | Judge |
Presiding over the case, referred to as 'Judge', 'your Honor', and 'THE COURT'.
|
| MS. POMERANTZ | Attorney |
Attorney who voices an objection to the expert witness.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
"Judge, at this time, I would proffer Professor Elizabeth Loftus as an expert in the field of memory science, the nature of memory reconstruction, and the impact of events upon memory."Source
"Consistent with my prior ruling, I indicate Professor Loftus as an expert in the fields you've indicated. Go ahead."Source
"One of the things we know about memory is it doesn't work like a recording device. You don't just record the event and play it back later. The process is much more complex."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,315 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document