This document is a court transcript from a trial, case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed on August 10, 2022. The transcript captures a legal debate between two attorneys, Ms. Comey and Ms. Menninger, in front of the judge regarding the admissibility of defendants' Exhibit J36. Ms. Comey argues the exhibit is a violation of Rule 16 as it was not produced by the court-ordered deadline, while Ms. Menninger contends it is impeachment material and thus exempt from the rule, a point which Ms. Comey then disputes.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal matter, asking questions to the attorneys.
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
Arguing that the defense violated Rule 16 by not producing Exhibit J36 by the deadline.
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
Arguing that Exhibit J36 is for impeachment purposes and therefore not subject to the Rule 16 deadline for case-in-ch...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
"With respect to the Rule 16 issue, defendants Exhibit J36, what's never produced to the government in Rule 16, the Court set a Rule 16 production deadline of November 8th of this year."Source
"Your Honor, that rule applies to any documents that we're offering in our case in chief, not as impeachment."Source
"Your Honor, then this is extrinsic evidence that is inadmissible under the rules of evidence to impeach."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,490 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document