DOJ-OGR-00018783.jpg
488 KB
Extraction Summary
6
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
488 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing the cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. The questioning focuses on a complaint (Exhibit C5) where Carolyn made a claim against a Mr. Epstein; Carolyn now states that the complaint, which she previously testified under oath was accurate, was in fact not accurate. Mr. Pagliuca also establishes that a specific paragraph of the complaint does not contain the name "Maxwell."
People (6)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Being cross-examined by Mr. Pagliuca about a complaint she previously filed.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Conducting the cross-examination of the witness, Carolyn.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceedings, making rulings on motions and objections.
|
| Mr. Epstein | Subject of a complaint |
Mentioned as the subject of a factual claim made by Carolyn in a complaint.
|
| Maxwell |
A name that is noted as not being present in paragraph 11 of the complaint.
|
|
| MS. COMEY | Attorney |
Making an objection during the proceedings.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Carolyn by attorney Mr. Pagliuca regarding a complaint (Exhibit C5) she previously testified was accurate. The questioning focuses on a claim against Mr. Epstein in paragraph 11.
Courtroom (implied)
Relationships (3)
Mr. Pagliuca is an attorney cross-examining Carolyn, who is a witness in a court proceeding.
Carolyn made a "factual claim" against Mr. Epstein in a complaint, suggesting a legal dispute or accusation.
They are opposing counsel in a court case, as Ms. Comey objects to Mr. Pagliuca's motion.
Key Quotes (3)
"It wasn't accurate."Source
— Carolyn
(In response to a question about whether she had testified under oath that a complaint was complete and accurate.)
DOJ-OGR-00018783.jpg
Quote #1
"Yes, but they had it wrong."Source
— Carolyn
(Confirming she had testified under oath about the complaint's accuracy, but qualifying that statement.)
DOJ-OGR-00018783.jpg
Quote #2
"Paragraph 11 does not contain the name "Maxwell," correct?"Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Questioning Carolyn about the specific contents of paragraph 11 of the complaint.)
DOJ-OGR-00018783.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,205 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 185 of 264 1626
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
1 THE COURT: We'll take it at the break.
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Okay.
3 BY MR. PAGLIUCA:
4 Q. Carolyn, I'd like to ask you some questions about Exhibit
5 C5, if we can display that for the witness, please.
6 A. Go ahead.
7 Q. Thank you. Carolyn, I want to direct your attention first
8 to paragraph 21 of exhibit -- 11 of Exhibit C5.
9 A. Okay.
10 Q. This was the complaint that you reviewed with your lawyers
11 and testified under oath that it was complete and accurate;
12 correct?
13 A. It wasn't accurate.
14 Q. That's what you testified to under oath; correct?
15 A. Yes, but they had it wrong.
16 Q. Paragraph 11 is a factual claim that you made against
17 Mr. Epstein in that complaint; correct?
18 A. Yes.
19 Q. Paragraph 11 does not contain the name "Maxwell," correct?
20 A. Correct.
21 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I'm going to move for the
22 admission of paragraph 11.
23 MS. COMEY: Your Honor, same objection.
24 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, I can respond --
25 THE COURT: No, on this one, on paragraph 11, I will
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018783
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document