DOJ-OGR-00002215.jpg
634 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
0
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
634 KB
Summary
This legal document, filed on behalf of Ms. Maxwell, argues for her release on bond. It refutes the government's claims by explaining that a pre-arrest discussion of divorce with her spouse was a strategic measure to protect him, not a sign of a weak relationship. The document further asserts that Ms. Maxwell has fully disclosed her and her spouse's finances and accuses the government of baselessly claiming she was deceptive rather than challenging the accuracy of the financial report.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Maxwell | Defendant |
The central figure in the document, whose bail conditions and financial disclosures are being discussed.
|
| Ms. Maxwell's spouse | Spouse / Potential co-signer |
Mentioned throughout the document in relation to Ms. Maxwell's personal ties, financial assets, and a pre-arrest disc...
|
Organizations (3)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| the government | government agency |
The opposing party in the legal case, whose arguments against Ms. Maxwell's bail are being rebutted.
|
| the Court | judicial body |
The judicial body that previously denied bail and is being addressed in this filing.
|
| Pretrial Services | government agency |
An agency that the government alleges Ms. Maxwell deceived about her assets.
|
Timeline (3 events)
Ms. Maxwell's arrest.
An initial bail hearing for Ms. Maxwell.
Ms. Maxwell and her spouse discussed getting a divorce prior to her arrest as a way to protect him.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned in the context of Ms. Maxwell's relationship with her spouse being a 'powerful tie to this country'.
|
Relationships (1)
The document describes them as spouses, discusses their relationship as a 'powerful tie to this country', mentions their pre-arrest discussion of divorce, and refers to their joint assets.
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,784 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 103 Filed 12/23/20 Page 9 of 15
mistaken. Prior to her arrest, Ms. Maxwell and her spouse had discussed the idea of getting a divorce as an additional way to create distance between Ms. Maxwell and her spouse to protect him [REDACTED] from the terrible consequences of being associated with her. Nevertheless, in the weeks following the initial bail hearing, [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] She and her spouse therefore had no reason to continue discussing divorce, which neither of them wanted in the first place. Nor was there any reason for her spouse to refrain from stepping forward as a co-signer. In sum, the government has offered nothing but unsupported innuendo to suggest that Ms. Maxwell's relationship with her spouse [REDACTED] is not a powerful tie to this country.
The government's assertion that Ms. Maxwell must not have a close relationship with [REDACTED] is particularly callous and belied by the facts. (Gov. Mem. at 14). As her spouse explains, [REDACTED] (Ex. A ¶ 12). [REDACTED]
B. Ms. Maxwell Has Thoroughly Disclosed Her Finances and Pledged All of Her and Her Spouse's Assets in Support of Her Bond
The government's attempts to rebut the financial condition report are unavailing. Significantly, the government does not contest the accuracy of the report, nor the voluminous supporting documentation. In fact, the government has proffered nothing that calls into question the report's detailed account of Ms. Maxwell and her spouse's assets for the last five years, which addresses one of the Court's principal reasons for denying bail.
Rather than question the report itself, the government attempts to argue that Ms. Maxwell deceived the Court and Pretrial Services about her assets. (Gov. Mem. at 22-23).
5
DOJ-OGR-00002215
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document