HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021263.jpg

1.56 MB

Extraction Summary

1
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
0
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Academic text / book excerpt / report
File Size: 1.56 MB
Summary

This document appears to be page 17 of a larger academic work or report titled 'From Selfish Genes to Social Brains,' stamped with a House Oversight identifier. It discusses the mission of the Chicago Social Brain Network and summarizes a chapter by social neuroscientist John Cacioppo regarding the evolution of the 'social brain' cooperative behaviors, and the selfish gene hypothesis. The text explores the intersection of evolutionary biology, psychology, and social cooperation.

People (1)

Name Role Context
John Cacioppo Social Neuroscientist
Subject of the text; draws on evolutionary theory to examine the 'selfish gene' hypothesis and the 'social brain'.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
The Chicago Social Brain Network
Established to examine how science informs human nature; likely the entity producing this text.

Relationships (1)

John Cacioppo Academic/Professional The Chicago Social Brain Network
The text discusses Cacioppo's work in the context of the Network's focus.

Key Quotes (3)

"what is best for me is best for the society."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021263.jpg
Quote #1
"Science can describe what religion does in rigorous ways that benefit religion, and religion can serve a meaning-making function that science itself disclaims."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021263.jpg
Quote #2
"Over the millennia of human evolution, this process has created the social brain and made humans a unique social animal."
Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021263.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,006 characters)

Page | 17
From Selfish Genes to Social Brains
The Chicago Social Brain Network was established to examine how science might inform us about our fundamental human nature, including the apparently irrepressible quest for connection with a higher understanding and organization. Science can describe what religion does in rigorous ways that benefit religion, and religion can serve a meaning-making function that science itself disclaims. This is not to say that science can address the existence of God. Our Network instead focuses on the consequences of believing in such a mind and of seeing into that mind.
In the next chapter, John Cacioppo, a social neuroscientist, draws on work on evolutionary theory, sociobiology, and evolutionary psychology to examine the implications of the selfish gene hypothesis for Homo sapiens. He shows how the notion of the selfish gene has been joined with political theory, consumerism, and economics to produce a dominant modern image of humans summarized by the phrase "what is best for me is best for the society." Without rejecting the selfish gene view, Cacioppo shows how it evolves in humans into what he calls the "social brain"– a large cerebral cortex and an interconnected limbic lobule that together are sensitive to the complexities of physical and social environments. Central to this complexity is the long period of dependency of the human infant and the interdependencies of adult humans for survival especially in hostile environments (e.g., warfare). For the selfish gene to contribute its DNA to the ongoing gene pool, the individual must not only reproduce but also cooperate with others to assure that his or her offspring also grow to maturity and reproduce. This leads to natural selection choosing those genes and capacities that contribute to cooperation, reciprocity, attachments, and generosity. Over the millennia of human evolution, this process has created the social brain and made humans a unique social animal.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_021263

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document