DOJ-OGR-00016892.jpg
592 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
592 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between an attorney, Mr. Everdell, and the judge. Mr. Everdell discusses his intent to use newly acquired property records for Stanhope Mews to impeach a witness's deposition testimony about their residence. He argues that despite the government's objection, further factual development, and possibly an additional witness, is necessary to counter the government's claims.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney (implied) |
Speaker in the court transcript, representing the defense.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, presiding over the case.
|
| Your Honor | Judge |
Title used by Mr. Everdell to address The Court.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| government | government agency |
Mentioned as objecting to property records and making an argument about a witness's residence.
|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion in court regarding the introduction of new evidence (Stanhope Mews property records) to impeach a witness's deposition testimony and the potential need for an additional witness, which could delay the trial.
Courtroom (implied)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
The location of property for which records were obtained from the land registry.
|
Relationships (1)
The dialogue shows a formal, professional interaction typical of a courtroom, with Mr. Everdell addressing the judge as 'Your Honor' and presenting legal arguments for the judge's consideration.
Key Quotes (3)
"All I heard was from the government is that they're now going to object to the other property records, the Stanhope Mews property records, which we were just getting today because we're trying to deal with this issue that came up."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Explaining why the property records are being discussed and that the government objects to them.)
DOJ-OGR-00016892.jpg
Quote #1
"The whole point of this is you want to impeach the witness's testimony as to which residence it was; right? That's the whole point of this?"Source
— THE COURT
(Clarifying the purpose of introducing the new property records.)
DOJ-OGR-00016892.jpg
Quote #2
"Your Honor, yes, because at that point, even though the sides could argue both sides, we feel like we need additional factual development to be able to counter the government's argument that she didn't reside there based on the deposition testimony."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Arguing for the need for an additional witness or further proceedings to properly use the new evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00016892.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,638 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 163 of 197
LCHCmax5
LCHCmax5
1 think both sides argue what they want from it; right?
2 MR. EVERDELL: I think that's right. All I heard was
3 from the government is that they're now going to object to the
4 other property records, the Stanhope Mews property records,
5 which we were just getting today because we're trying to deal
6 with this issue that came up. We got them from the land
7 registry. I'm happy to show them to the government.
8 THE COURT: You say they came up. The whole point of
9 this is you want to impeach the witness's testimony as to which
10 residence it was; right? That's the whole point of this?
11 MR. EVERDELL: That's correct.
12 THE COURT: So let me just ask, if there is a stip as
13 to the two different property ownership records and the depo
14 testimony coming in, is there a need for an additional witness?
15 Is the defense still seeking an additional witness on Monday
16 that delays trial?
17 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think we need to just
18 confer on that one moment.
19 THE COURT: Sure.
20 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, yes, because at that point,
21 even though the sides could argue both sides, we feel like we
22 need additional factual development to be able to counter the
23 government's argument that she didn't reside there based on the
24 deposition testimony.
25 THE COURT: And when did you get the depo?
2 MR. EVERDELL: I think that's right. All I heard was
3 from the government is that they're now going to object to the
4 other property records, the Stanhope Mews property records,
5 which we were just getting today because we're trying to deal
6 with this issue that came up. We got them from the land
7 registry. I'm happy to show them to the government.
8 THE COURT: You say they came up. The whole point of
9 this is you want to impeach the witness's testimony as to which
10 residence it was; right? That's the whole point of this?
11 MR. EVERDELL: That's correct.
12 THE COURT: So let me just ask, if there is a stip as
13 to the two different property ownership records and the depo
14 testimony coming in, is there a need for an additional witness?
15 Is the defense still seeking an additional witness on Monday
16 that delays trial?
17 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, I think we need to just
18 confer on that one moment.
19 THE COURT: Sure.
20 MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, yes, because at that point,
21 even though the sides could argue both sides, we feel like we
22 need additional factual development to be able to counter the
23 government's argument that she didn't reside there based on the
24 deposition testimony.
25 THE COURT: And when did you get the depo?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016892
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document