DOJ-OGR-00016475.jpg
560 KB
Extraction Summary
3
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
560 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a discussion between a judge (The Court) and two attorneys, Ms. Menninger and Ms. Moe. The conversation centers on resolving an attorney-client privilege issue stemming from an email. The judge instructs the attorneys to confer and, if they cannot reach an agreement, sets a deadline of the following Wednesday for the matter to be fully briefed and discussed again.
People (3)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, addressing the court.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, addressing the court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the hearing, speaking to the attorneys.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2022-08-10
A court hearing where the judge and attorneys discuss resolving an attorney-client privilege issue related to an email.
Courtroom
The parties are instructed to confer to try and reach a resolution on the privilege issue.
The Court schedules a potential discussion and full briefing on privilege-related issues for the upcoming Wednesday if the parties cannot resolve it themselves.
Court
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting company, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (3)
Ms. Menninger is an attorney appearing before the judge (The Court) in a legal proceeding.
Ms. Moe is an attorney appearing before the judge (The Court) in a legal proceeding.
Both are attorneys involved in the same case, instructed by the court to confer on an issue.
Key Quotes (3)
"I think it's a close call in light of the email I've seen."Source
— Unknown (likely the judge or an attorney)
(Expressing an opinion on the difficulty of the attorney-client privilege issue related to the email.)
DOJ-OGR-00016475.jpg
Quote #1
"So if you don't reach resolution, then I'll either -- I'll resolve or tell you what additional steps I need in order to resolve."Source
— THE COURT
(Instructing the parties on the next steps if they cannot agree on the privilege issue.)
DOJ-OGR-00016475.jpg
Quote #2
"I'm fine for it to be discussed and then fully briefed again sometime on Wednesday, if that works."Source
— THE COURT
(Setting a schedule for further legal briefings on the matter.)
DOJ-OGR-00016475.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,409 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 759 Filed 08/10/22 Page 259 of 267
LCAVMAX8
2287
LCAVMAX8
2287
1 Because I think -- as I said, I think that doesn't -- there's a
2 basis for it in the email; it doesn't require wading into
3 attorney-client privilege issues; and I think it gives the
4 defense what it's looking for, as would an inquiry, which would
5 be limited, into what the attorney said to the client. I
6 haven't come to rest on how that's resolved, but I've indicated
7 I think it's a close call in light of the email I've seen.
8 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.
9 THE COURT: So you'll confer.
10 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.
11 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
12 THE COURT: I have briefing currently on that issue.
13 So if you don't reach resolution, then I'll either -- I'll
14 resolve or tell you what additional steps I need in order to
15 resolve. If there are other issues that are similar, we should
16 probably talk about timing for briefing --
17 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
18 THE COURT: -- following conferral.
19 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
20 Is there a particular date upon which the Court would
21 like to receive briefing from the parties about any additional
22 privilege-related issues?
23 THE COURT: I'm fine for it to be discussed and then
24 fully briefed again sometime on Wednesday, if that works.
25 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
2 basis for it in the email; it doesn't require wading into
3 attorney-client privilege issues; and I think it gives the
4 defense what it's looking for, as would an inquiry, which would
5 be limited, into what the attorney said to the client. I
6 haven't come to rest on how that's resolved, but I've indicated
7 I think it's a close call in light of the email I've seen.
8 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.
9 THE COURT: So you'll confer.
10 MS. MENNINGER: Yes, your Honor.
11 MS. MOE: Thank you, your Honor.
12 THE COURT: I have briefing currently on that issue.
13 So if you don't reach resolution, then I'll either -- I'll
14 resolve or tell you what additional steps I need in order to
15 resolve. If there are other issues that are similar, we should
16 probably talk about timing for briefing --
17 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
18 THE COURT: -- following conferral.
19 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
20 Is there a particular date upon which the Court would
21 like to receive briefing from the parties about any additional
22 privilege-related issues?
23 THE COURT: I'm fine for it to be discussed and then
24 fully briefed again sometime on Wednesday, if that works.
25 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016475
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document