This document is page 3 of 5 of a court order filed on September 2, 2020, in Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN (United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell). The Court denies the Defendant's request to modify a protective order to allow the disclosure of discovery documents to judges in related civil cases, characterizing the Defendant's arguments as 'vague, speculative, and conclusory.' The text references a grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and subpoenas issued to an unnamed 'Recipient' entity.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Defendant | Defendant (Ghislaine Maxwell based on Case No. 1:20-cr-00330-AJN) |
Requesting modification of a protective order to disclose documents to civil courts; request denied.
|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of investigation |
Mentioned in the context of a Government grand jury investigation into him and possible co-conspirators.
|
| judicial officers / judicial decisionmakers | Judges |
Presiding over related civil matters.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Government |
Opened grand jury investigation; filed a docketed letter (Dkt. No. 46).
|
|
| Recipient |
An unnamed entity that received grand jury subpoenas and concluded it could not turn over materials without modificat...
|
|
| The Court |
The entity denying the Defendant's request.
|
"The Defendant’s request is DENIED on this basis."Source
"Grand jury subpoenas were issued to an entity (“Recipient”) after the Government opened a grand jury investigation into Jeffrey Epstein and his possible co-conspirators;"Source
"...the Defendant proffers no more than vague, speculative, and conclusory assertions..."Source
"...fourteen single-spaced pages of heated rhetoric..."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,077 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document