DOJ-OGR-00017677.jpg
513 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (cross-examination)
File Size:
513 KB
Summary
This document is a page from the court transcript of the cross-examination of a witness identified as 'Jane' in the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE). The defense attorney attempts to impeach the witness's credibility by highlighting inconsistencies between her current testimony, a statement given in December 2019 (where she had no specific memory), and a statement from February 2020 (where she recalled two other girls being present). The witness claims the government's written record of her statement contains a 'typo' or incorrect wording.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane | Witness |
Under cross-examination regarding inconsistencies in her testimony compared to prior statements.
|
| Maxwell | Subject |
Ghislaine Maxwell; referenced regarding the 'first time' the witness was with her.
|
| Ms. Moe | Attorney (Prosecution) |
Objecting to the defense's line of questioning.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Ruling on objections.
|
| Q (Defense Counsel) | Attorney |
Questioning the witness about prior statements to the government.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. | ||
| The Government |
Referenced as having taken notes/statements from the witness.
|
Relationships (2)
Jane provided statements to the government in 2019 and 2020.
Key Quotes (4)
"It refreshes your recollection, it's true that you told the government that the first time with Maxwell, there were two other girls there as well, correct?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00017677.jpg
Quote #1
"Correct, but the wording that was typed up on this isn't correct"Source
DOJ-OGR-00017677.jpg
Quote #2
"Another typo by the government?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00017677.jpg
Quote #3
"So, yesterday you gave a story that is different from December 2019 when you had no specific memory and is different from February 2020 when there were two other girls there as well, correct?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00017677.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,224 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 68 of 264 474
LC1Qmax2 Jane - Cross
LC1Qmax2 Jane - Cross
1 were two other girls there as well, correct?
2 A. I don't recall.
3 Q. At 3509-008, page 4, first full paragraph, beginning in the
4 middle of the paragraph.
5 MS. MOE: And, your Honor, is the question whether
6 that refreshes the witness' recollection?
7 THE COURT: That will be the question. Go ahead.
8 Q. Does it refresh your recollection to read the sentence
9 beginning with the first time? Yes or no.
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. It refreshes your recollection, it's true that you told the
12 government that the first time with Maxwell, there were two
13 other girls there as well, correct?
14 A. Correct, but the wording that was typed up on this isn't
15 correct, so I don't know how to --
16 Q. Another typo by the government?
17 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor.
18 THE COURT: Overruled.
19 Q. It's another typo?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. So, yesterday you gave a story that is different from
22 December 2019 when you had no specific memory and is different
23 from February 2020 when there were two other girls there as
24 well, correct?
25 MS. MOE: Objection. Compound.
2 A. I don't recall.
3 Q. At 3509-008, page 4, first full paragraph, beginning in the
4 middle of the paragraph.
5 MS. MOE: And, your Honor, is the question whether
6 that refreshes the witness' recollection?
7 THE COURT: That will be the question. Go ahead.
8 Q. Does it refresh your recollection to read the sentence
9 beginning with the first time? Yes or no.
10 A. Yes.
11 Q. It refreshes your recollection, it's true that you told the
12 government that the first time with Maxwell, there were two
13 other girls there as well, correct?
14 A. Correct, but the wording that was typed up on this isn't
15 correct, so I don't know how to --
16 Q. Another typo by the government?
17 MS. MOE: Objection, your Honor.
18 THE COURT: Overruled.
19 Q. It's another typo?
20 A. Yes.
21 Q. So, yesterday you gave a story that is different from
22 December 2019 when you had no specific memory and is different
23 from February 2020 when there were two other girls there as
24 well, correct?
25 MS. MOE: Objection. Compound.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017677
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document