DOJ-OGR-00013175.jpg
576 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
576 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a legal argument by an attorney, Mr. Pagliuca. He requests permission from the judge to cross-examine a witness, Carolyn, on her extensive psychiatric history, drug abuse, and schizophrenia, arguing that the witness minimized these issues and her own testimony opened the door for this line of questioning.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a cross-examination.
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, arguing to be allowed to inquire about a witness's psychiatric history and drug abuse.
|
| Ms. Sternheim | Attorney |
Speaker in the transcript, likely opposing counsel.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the transcript, presiding over the proceedings.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion during a court hearing regarding the scope of cross-examination of a witness named Carolyn. Mr. Pagliuca argues that the witness's testimony on direct examination opened the door to questions about her psychiatric history, drug abuse, and schizophrenia.
Courtroom
Relationships (2)
Mr. Pagliuca is an attorney cross-examining Carolyn, who is a witness in a legal case.
They are both attorneys participating in the same court proceeding, likely as opposing counsel.
Key Quotes (2)
"I believe that I should be allowed to inquire about her extensive psychiatric history."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Arguing to the judge about the scope of his cross-examination of the witness.)
DOJ-OGR-00013175.jpg
Quote #1
"There was also testimony raised sort of in the vein of, I'm schizophrenic and I am schizophrenic about my children because they're important to me, essentially, and that's why I have this schizophrenia and hear voices around my children."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Paraphrasing or quoting the witness's prior testimony to justify further questioning on her psychiatric condition.)
DOJ-OGR-00013175.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,448 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 162 of 264
LC7VMAX5
Carolyn - cross
LC7VMAX5
Carolyn - cross
1 talk about it now.
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Sure. I don't know if you want to deal
3 with Ms. Sternheim's issue first.
4 MS. STERNHEIM: Mine should go to the back of the bus
5 on this.
6 THE COURT: Okay.
7 MR. PAGLIUCA: So there was direct examination
8 testimony, your Honor, concerning psychiatric issues, ongoing
9 psychiatric issues, with this witness. I think there was some
10 minimization of the ongoing psychiatric issues. And the
11 records that I have reflect much more extensive psychiatric
12 issues.
13 I believe that I should be allowed to inquire about
14 her extensive psychiatric history. There were questions on
15 direct examination about her ongoing drug abuse, and I think
16 that opens -- and I think it was minimized. And I think that
17 that opens the door to my being able to examine on the full
18 extent of her ongoing drug abuse.
19 There was also testimony raised sort of in the vein
20 of, I'm schizophrenic and I am schizophrenic about my children
21 because they're important to me, essentially, and that's why I
22 have this schizophrenia and hear voices around my children.
23 This witness has a significant history of having her
24 children taken away from her and these children living with her
25 mother or other relatives. And I think that the way that the
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: Sure. I don't know if you want to deal
3 with Ms. Sternheim's issue first.
4 MS. STERNHEIM: Mine should go to the back of the bus
5 on this.
6 THE COURT: Okay.
7 MR. PAGLIUCA: So there was direct examination
8 testimony, your Honor, concerning psychiatric issues, ongoing
9 psychiatric issues, with this witness. I think there was some
10 minimization of the ongoing psychiatric issues. And the
11 records that I have reflect much more extensive psychiatric
12 issues.
13 I believe that I should be allowed to inquire about
14 her extensive psychiatric history. There were questions on
15 direct examination about her ongoing drug abuse, and I think
16 that opens -- and I think it was minimized. And I think that
17 that opens the door to my being able to examine on the full
18 extent of her ongoing drug abuse.
19 There was also testimony raised sort of in the vein
20 of, I'm schizophrenic and I am schizophrenic about my children
21 because they're important to me, essentially, and that's why I
22 have this schizophrenia and hear voices around my children.
23 This witness has a significant history of having her
24 children taken away from her and these children living with her
25 mother or other relatives. And I think that the way that the
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00013175
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document