DOJ-OGR-00018800.jpg
546 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
546 KB
Summary
This document is page 202 of a court transcript from Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell), filed on August 10, 2022. It captures a legal argument between attorney Mr. Pagliuca and the Judge regarding the admissibility of specific paragraphs describing Jeffrey Epstein's 'systematic pattern of sexually exploited behavior' utilizing a network of employees. The Judge sustains an objection regarding paragraph 206, ruling it is not inconsistent with testimony.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jeffrey Epstein | Subject of discussion |
Described in the text as a wealthy financier who used a network of employees to exploit minors.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Attorney |
Defense or Prosecution attorney arguing for the admission of factual paragraphs.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding judge (Judge Nathan or Judge Alison Nathan in the Maxwell trial context, though simply labeled 'The Court' ...
|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Name appears in the header 'Carolyn - cross', indicating this is likely during the cross-examination of Carolyn Andri...
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Transcription service listed in the footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Department of Justice (inferred from DOJ-OGR footer stamp).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Court proceeding/Cross-examination regarding Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE (USA v. Ghislaine Maxwell).
Courtroom (Southern District)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Jurisdiction implied by the court reporter stamp.
|
Relationships (2)
Text describes a 'network of assistants and employees used his resource... to engage in a systematic pattern of sexually exploited behavior.'
Dialogue between attorney and judge regarding trial procedure.
Key Quotes (2)
"Epstein's a wealthy financier with a lavish home, wealth, a network of assistants and employees used his resource and influence over a vulnerable minor child to engage in a systematic pattern of sexually exploited behavior."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018800.jpg
Quote #1
"So 206 is not inconsistent. Therefore, the objection is sustained."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018800.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,350 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 202 of 264 1643
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
LC7Cmax6 Carolyn - cross
1 illegal acts. And then if you turn back to 12, 12 says,
2 Epstein's a wealthy financier with a lavish home, wealth, a
3 network of assistants and employees used his resource and
4 influence over a vulnerable minor child to engage in a
5 systematic pattern of sexually exploited behavior.
6 I mean, on its terms, it references additional people.
7 And so, on its face, it's not exclusive and I think that puts
8 it in a different position.
9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, with regard to this
10 exhibit, I was simply offering discrete factual paragraphs.
11 THE COURT: Right. But 206 -- so 206 was the one that
12 we began with. I don't think that paragraph is factually
13 inconsistent with the testimony for precisely the reason I've
14 just indicated.
15 MR. PAGLIUCA: I think we left off with 206.
16 THE COURT: So what's the next paragraph?
17 MR. PAGLIUCA: I mean, I can go through it and tell
18 you all the paragraphs that I'm intending to introduce or
19 ask --
20 THE COURT: So 206 is not inconsistent. Therefore,
21 the objection is sustained.
22 What's the next paragraph?
23 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, let me look at 206 and hopefully
24 respond to that.
25 THE COURT: That's fine.
2 Epstein's a wealthy financier with a lavish home, wealth, a
3 network of assistants and employees used his resource and
4 influence over a vulnerable minor child to engage in a
5 systematic pattern of sexually exploited behavior.
6 I mean, on its terms, it references additional people.
7 And so, on its face, it's not exclusive and I think that puts
8 it in a different position.
9 MR. PAGLIUCA: Your Honor, with regard to this
10 exhibit, I was simply offering discrete factual paragraphs.
11 THE COURT: Right. But 206 -- so 206 was the one that
12 we began with. I don't think that paragraph is factually
13 inconsistent with the testimony for precisely the reason I've
14 just indicated.
15 MR. PAGLIUCA: I think we left off with 206.
16 THE COURT: So what's the next paragraph?
17 MR. PAGLIUCA: I mean, I can go through it and tell
18 you all the paragraphs that I'm intending to introduce or
19 ask --
20 THE COURT: So 206 is not inconsistent. Therefore,
21 the objection is sustained.
22 What's the next paragraph?
23 MR. PAGLIUCA: Well, let me look at 206 and hopefully
24 respond to that.
25 THE COURT: That's fine.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018800
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document