This document is a legal filing, specifically a section from a motion for a stay filed on behalf of Maxwell. It outlines the applicable legal standards for staying a civil action pending the completion of a parallel criminal prosecution. The document cites several legal precedents to argue that while such a stay is an "extraordinary remedy," courts will grant one when justice requires, particularly when there is an overlap of issues between the civil and criminal cases, and lists six factors that guide the court's decision.
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. | company |
Named as a party in the case citation Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc.
|
| LY USA, Inc. | company |
Named as a party in the case citation Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc.
|
| Sec. & Exch. Comm’n | government agency |
Named as a party in the case citations Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. LaGuardia and Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. Shkreli.
|
| Worldcom, Inc. | company |
Mentioned in the case citation In re Worldcom, Inc. Securities Litigation.
|
| Trustees of Plumbers & Pipefitters Nat. Pension Fund | pension fund |
Named as a party in the case citation Trustees of Plumbers & Pipefitters Nat. Pension Fund v. Transworld Mech., Inc.
|
| Transworld Mech., Inc. | company |
Named as a party in the case citation Trustees of Plumbers & Pipefitters Nat. Pension Fund v. Transworld Mech., Inc.
|
| Volmar Distributors, Inc. | company |
Named as a party in the case citation Volmar Distributors, Inc. v. New York Post Co.
|
| New York Post Co. | company |
Named as a party in the case citation Volmar Distributors, Inc. v. New York Post Co.
|
"extraordinary remedy"Source
"courts will not hesitate to grant a stay ‘when the interests of justice seem to require’ it"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (2,134 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document