DOJ-OGR-00019449.jpg

742 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
8
Organizations
2
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 742 KB
Summary

This document is a legal filing, specifically a section from a motion for a stay filed on behalf of Maxwell. It outlines the applicable legal standards for staying a civil action pending the completion of a parallel criminal prosecution. The document cites several legal precedents to argue that while such a stay is an "extraordinary remedy," courts will grant one when justice requires, particularly when there is an overlap of issues between the civil and criminal cases, and lists six factors that guide the court's decision.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Maxwell
Mentioned in the heading "MAXWELL’S MOTION FOR A STAY".
LaGuardia
Named as a party in the case citation Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. LaGuardia.
Shkreli
Named as a party in the case citation Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. Shkreli.

Organizations (8)

Name Type Context
Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. company
Named as a party in the case citation Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc.
LY USA, Inc. company
Named as a party in the case citation Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc.
Sec. & Exch. Comm’n government agency
Named as a party in the case citations Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. LaGuardia and Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. Shkreli.
Worldcom, Inc. company
Mentioned in the case citation In re Worldcom, Inc. Securities Litigation.
Trustees of Plumbers & Pipefitters Nat. Pension Fund pension fund
Named as a party in the case citation Trustees of Plumbers & Pipefitters Nat. Pension Fund v. Transworld Mech., Inc.
Transworld Mech., Inc. company
Named as a party in the case citation Trustees of Plumbers & Pipefitters Nat. Pension Fund v. Transworld Mech., Inc.
Volmar Distributors, Inc. company
Named as a party in the case citation Volmar Distributors, Inc. v. New York Post Co.
New York Post Co. company
Named as a party in the case citation Volmar Distributors, Inc. v. New York Post Co.

Timeline (1 events)

A motion for a stay of civil proceedings was filed by Maxwell.

Locations (2)

Location Context
Referenced multiple times in case citations as the Southern District of New York.
Referenced in a case citation as the Eastern District of New York.

Key Quotes (2)

"extraordinary remedy"
Source
— Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc. (Characterizing the act of staying a civil action pending the completion of a criminal prosecution.)
DOJ-OGR-00019449.jpg
Quote #1
"courts will not hesitate to grant a stay ‘when the interests of justice seem to require’ it"
Source
— Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc. (Stating the condition under which courts will grant a stay of civil proceedings.)
DOJ-OGR-00019449.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,134 characters)

Case 1:20-cv-00484-DGK-DER Document 820, Filed 09/14/20, Page 5 of 13
II. MAXWELL’S MOTION FOR A STAY
A. Applicable Legal Standards
Although staying a civil action pending the completion of a criminal prosecution against a named defendant has been characterized as an “extraordinary remedy,” Louis Vuitton Malletier S.A. v. LY USA, Inc., 676 F.3d 83, 98 (2d Cir. 2012), “courts will not hesitate to grant a stay ‘when the interests of justice seem to require’ it,” Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. LaGuardia, 435 F. Supp. 3d 616, 621 (S.D.N.Y. 2020) (citing In re Worldcom, Inc. Securities Litigation, No. 02cv3288 (DLC), 2002 WL 31729501, at *3 (S.D.N.Y. Dec. 5, 2002)) (granting a stay where there was overlap of issues in the civil and criminal cases and explaining that overlap of issues is a particularly significant factor); see also Trustees of Plumbers & Pipefitters Nat. Pension Fund v. Transworld Mech., Inc., 886 F. Supp. 1134 (S.D.N.Y. 1995) (same); Volmar Distributors, Inc. v. New York Post Co., 152 F.R.D. 36, 42 (S.D.N.Y. 1993) (staying civil discovery pending completion of the criminal case against the defendant); Sec. & Exch. Comm’n v. Shkreli, No. 15-CV-7175 (KAM) (RML), 2016 WL 1122029, at *7 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 2, 2016) (same).
Ultimately, the decision as to whether to issue such a stay rests in the discretion of the district court, Louis Vuitton Malletier, 676 F.3d at 99, and each case requires a particularized inquiry, see id., at 98. In determining whether a civil action should be stayed in the face of a parallel criminal proceeding, courts in this District have generally been guided by six factors: (1) the extent to which the issues in the criminal case overlap with those presented in the civil case; (2) the status of the criminal case, including whether the defendant has been indicted; (3) the private interests of the plaintiff in proceeding expeditiously weighed against the prejudice to the plaintiff caused by the delay; (4) the private interests of and burden on the defendant; (5) the interests of the court(s); and (6) the public interest. See id.; see also, e.g., Trustees of
5
DOJ-OGR-00019449

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document