DOJ-OGR-00019617.jpg
625 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
625 KB
Summary
This legal document, dated October 2, 2020, details a dispute in a criminal case concerning a Protective Order. The defendant, Maxwell, sought to modify the order on August 17, 2020, to use discovery materials from her criminal case in separate civil proceedings, despite having previously agreed not to. The Government filed an opposition to this motion on August 21, 2020, citing the original terms of the agreement.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Maxwell | Defendant |
Mentioned as the recipient of discovery material from the Government and the party who filed a motion to modify the P...
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
The judge whom Maxwell asked to modify the Protective Order.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Government | government agency |
The party that produced discovery material to Maxwell and opposed her motion to modify the Protective Order.
|
| District Court | government agency |
Mentioned in the section heading "The District Court Litigation", indicating the venue of the legal proceedings.
|
Timeline (3 events)
2019
The Government made applications seeking the modification of certain protective orders in other judicial proceedings.
2020-08-17
Maxwell asked Judge Nathan to modify the Protective Order to allow her to use discovery materials in civil cases.
District Court
2020-08-21
The Government filed an opposition to Maxwell's motion to modify the Protective Order.
District Court
Relationships (2)
The document describes a legal dispute where the Government is the prosecuting party against the defendant, Maxwell. The Government provided discovery materials under a Protective Order and opposed Maxwell's motion to modify it.
Maxwell, as a litigant, made a motion to Judge Nathan, who is presiding over the case.
Key Quotes (1)
"[s]hall be used by the Defendant or her Defense Counsel solely for purposes of the defense of this criminal action, and not for any civil proceeding or any purpose other than the defense of this action."Source
— Protective Order
(Quoted from the Protective Order to describe the restriction on the use of discovery material provided by the Government to Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00019617.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,589 characters)
Case 20-3061, Document 82, 10/02/2020, 2944267, Page10 of 37
4
in discovery in the criminal case. (A. 75-86). The Protective Order expressly provides that any and all discovery material produced to Maxwell by the Government, regardless of designation, “[s]hall be used by the Defendant or her Defense Counsel solely for purposes of the defense of this criminal action, and not for any civil proceeding or any purpose other than the defense of this action.” (Protective Order ¶¶ 1(a), 10(a), 14(a)). The Protective Order further provides that any discovery material produced to Maxwell by the Government that is marked “confidential” may not be filed publicly or excerpted within any public filing. (Protective Order ¶ 15). Maxwell’s criminal defense counsel consented to the foregoing provisions of the Protective Order. (See A. 40, 44-55).
C. The District Court Litigation
Despite having agreed to the prohibition on using the discovery materials in civil cases, on August 17, 2020, Maxwell asked Judge Nathan to modify the Protective Order to allow her to do exactly that. (A. 124-31). In particular, Maxwell’s motion sought authorization to use materials relating to applications the Government previously made in 2019 seeking the modification of certain protective orders in other judicial proceedings.
On August 21, 2020, the Government filed an opposition to Maxwell’s motion to modify the Protective Order. (A. 90-94). In its opposition, the Government explained the factual background regarding the confidential criminal discovery materials at issue. In par-
DOJ-OGR-00019617
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document