HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031511.jpg
2.26 MB
Extraction Summary
7
People
9
Organizations
2
Locations
0
Events
2
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
2.26 MB
Summary
An email thread from October 2016 between Landon Thomas Jr. and Jeffrey Epstein discussing Saudi Arabian financial movements (specifically SAMA withdrawals and BlackRock). Thomas asks for Epstein's take on a rumored $200 billion withdrawal. Epstein offers vague geopolitical commentary on the fragmentation of US power and the Saudi Royal family. Thomas also recommends an academic contact who is critical of Bill Clinton's NATO expansion, suggesting Epstein's 'Russian friends' would like him.
People (7)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Thomas Jr., Landon | Sender/Journalist |
Asking Epstein for financial insights regarding Saudi money; recommending an academic contact to Epstein.
|
| Jeffrey E. | Recipient/Source |
Providing commentary on Saudi investments, US politics, and market structures. Email: jeevacation@gmail.com
|
| Bill C | Former US President (implied Clinton) |
Criticized by the 'new guy' for NATO expansion.
|
| Donald Trump | Presidential Candidate (at the time) |
Subject of a Guardian article link sent by Epstein.
|
| Norm Lubow | Subject in article |
Mentioned in the URL sent by Epstein regarding Trump lawsuits.
|
| Bin Salman | Saudi Royal Figure |
Mentioned by Epstein as a potential focus of Landon's article.
|
| Unnamed Academic | Professor/Author |
Taught at SAIS, wrote 'Mission Failure', suggested by Landon for Epstein's 'stable of smart guys'.
|
Relationships (2)
Thomas asks Epstein for verification of financial rumors; Epstein provides geopolitical analysis.
Jeffrey Epstein
→
Social/Political
→
Russian friends
Landon Thomas mentions Epstein's 'Russian friends' would enjoy talking to a NATO critic.
Key Quotes (5)
"I am sure that your Russian friends would enjoy talking to him."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031511.jpg
Quote #1
"He is vicious on Bill C's NATO expansion -- biggest foreign policy error since WWII."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031511.jpg
Quote #2
"Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031511.jpg
Quote #3
"words that you to refer to one thing, USA . the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very useful."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031511.jpg
Quote #4
"blackrock is more money market , more like custodian than investor ."Source
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031511.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,782 characters)
From: Thomas Jr., Landon [REDACTED]
Sent: 10/19/2016 3:13:21 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Saudi money
Sent: 10/19/2016 3:13:21 PM
To: jeffrey E. [jeevacation@gmail.com]
Subject: Re: Saudi money
Importance: High
A new guy for your stable of smart guys. He taught at SAIS in DC where I went in 1989. I was just down there a few weeks ago and was on a panel with him. He is vicious on Bill C's NATO expansion -- biggest foreign policy error since WWII. Retiring. Let me know if you want an intro -- I am sure that your Russian friends would enjoy talking to him. Book well worth reading...
https://www.amazon.com/Mission-Failure-America-World-Post-Cold/dp/0190469471/ref=sr_1_1?s=books&ie=UTF8&qid=1476889698&sr=1-1&keywords=mission+failure
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 11:02 AM, jeffrey E. wrote:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2016/jul/07/donald-trump-sexual-assault-lawsuits-norm-lubow
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:28 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon <[REDACTED]> wrote:
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 10:26 AM, jeffrey E. wrote:
number
number
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:55 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon <[REDACTED]> wrote:
I have spoken to a lot of ceos of fund outfits who say Saudis have been pulling billions of dollars in separate account money -- not just from BR. And plus I cant believe they would have so much tied up in lock ups.
I have spoken to a lot of ceos of fund outfits who say Saudis have been pulling billions of dollars in separate account money -- not just from BR. And plus I cant believe they would have so much tied up in lock ups.
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:48 AM, jeffrey E. wrote:
sorry, no good handle without digging
sorry, no good handle without digging
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:47 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon <[REDACTED]> wrote:
what is your back of the envelope guess as to much saudi money tied up in such funds?
what is your back of the envelope guess as to much saudi money tied up in such funds?
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:43 AM, jeffrey E. wrote:
most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed . and im not seeing much in the secondary market. . blackrock is more money market , more like custodian than investor .
most of the saudi money is tied up in pe funds. no withdrawals allowed . and im not seeing much in the secondary market. . blackrock is more money market , more like custodian than investor .
On Wed, Oct 19, 2016 at 9:41 AM, Thomas Jr., Landon <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with what you know?
Interesting. CEO of big finance form told me that Saudis (SAMA) have withdrawn $200 billion that has been parked with usual suspects over past year or so. That number seem in line with what you know?
On Tue, Oct 18, 2016 at 7:04 AM, jeffrey E. wrote:
words that you to refer to one thing, USA . the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in tech, needs bio tech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members of a tribe. called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local
words that you to refer to one thing, USA . the stock market / the Royal family, . are no longer very useful. In politics the USA meant the white house. now there is pentagon. cia, state, and congress in addition, each feels empowered to act more independantly. stock market even in tech, needs bio tech, consuner tech. infrastrucrue tech. etc. same with Royal family, there are 20k members of a tribe. called the royal family, the words are misleading. if your article is focused on bin salman, or the very top. no one is wondering where they can find the local
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_031511
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document