EFTA00016159.pdf

58.2 KB

Extraction Summary

4
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Email chain / internal doj correspondence
File Size: 58.2 KB
Summary

This document is an email chain from June 2020 between attorneys at the US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of New York (USANYS). They are discussing the legal procedural requirements (specifically '6(e) orders' related to grand jury secrecy) needed to allow the Civil division to review specific 'trust agreements' related to the Epstein case. The discussion highlights concerns about privacy, protective orders, and whether to notify the individuals who provided the trust agreements.

People (4)

Name Role Context
John McEnany USANYS Attorney
Sender of an email discussing the need for a new court order regarding disclosure and privacy concerns.
L. Fogelman USANYS / DOJ
Cc'd on the email chain (email address LFogelman@usa.doj.gov visible).
Ted Unknown (likely colleague)
Referenced in the text 'order attached to Ted's email'.
Redacted Sender (Page 2) Co-Chief, Public Corruption Unit
Author of the earliest email in the visible thread, from the SDNY Public Corruption Unit.

Timeline (2 events)

2020-02-03
Date referenced in the attachment filename regarding a signed 6e disclosure order.
Court
2020-06-29
Internal discussion regarding legal procedure for disclosing trust agreements to the Civil division.
SDNY
John McEnany USANYS Staff

Locations (2)

Relationships (1)

John McEnany Colleagues L. Fogelman
Included on the same internal USANYS email chain.

Key Quotes (3)

"Do you have a copy of the second 6(e) order from February that allowed Civil to review the additional trust agreements beyond those referenced in the order attached to Ted's email?"
Source
EFTA00016159.pdf
Quote #1
"We need to apply for a new order with an application that would discuss why we need to disclose; privacy concerns; potential protective orders; should we give notice to the people we got the trust agreements from (and if not why not), etc."
Source
EFTA00016159.pdf
Quote #2
"This is the original order, which does seem to suggest we need 'further order of the court' to further disclose."
Source
EFTA00016159.pdf
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,617 characters)

From: [REDACTED]
To: "[REDACTED] (USANYS)" <[REDACTED]>
Cc: "[REDACTED]" <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re: Epstein
Date: Mon, 29 Jun 2020 22:46:36 +0000
Thank you!
On Jun 29, 2020, at 6:45 PM, [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Sorry, I think I found it. Attached.
From: [REDACTED]
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 5:44 PM
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re: Epstein
[REDACTED]
Do you have a copy of the second 6(e) order from February that allowed Civil to review the additional trust agreements beyond those referenced in the order attached to Ted's email? I don't have a copy.
Thanks,
[REDACTED]
On Jun 29, 2020, at 2:13 PM, McEnany, John (USANYS) <[REDACTED]> wrote:
Yes. We need to apply for a new order with an application that would discuss why we need to disclose; privacy concerns; potential protective orders; should we give notice to the people we got the trust agreements from (and if not why not), etc.
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Sent: Monday, June 29, 2020 2:05 PM
To: McEnany, John (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Cc: F[REDACTED] (USANYS)
Subject: FW: Epstein
This is the original order, which does seem to suggest we need "further order of the court" to further disclose.
From: [REDACTED] (USANYS)
Sent: Wednesday, January 29, 2020 9:33 AM
To: [REDACTED] (USANYS) <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Epstein
[Page 2]
Will come by in a second.
[REDACTED]
Co-Chief, Public Corruption Unit
U.S. Attorney's Office for the
Southern District of New York
Tel. ([REDACTED]
<2020-02-03, JE, 6e disclosure, signed order.pdf>
EFTA00016159
EFTA00016160

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document