This document is a page from a court transcript dated January 15, 2025, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. Attorney Mr. Pagliuca cross-examines a witness, Rocchio, about a study the witness relied upon. Pagliuca challenges the study's credibility by pointing out that a key phrase, "right away," is undefined, and Rocchio admits to not having reviewed all the underlying data or cited references in the summary article.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judicial officer |
Speaks at the beginning of the transcript, saying "OK."
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA | Attorney |
The individual asking questions (Q.) during the cross-examination.
|
| Rocchio | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the person being cross-examined. The individual providing answers (A.) in the transcript.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
"Two-thirds of the sample did not disclose right away."Source
"So to be clear, the article that I submitted was a summary of the literature. I'm not saying that I have read and examined every study cited in this particular article."Source
"I have not gone back to look at every reference cited in"Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,428 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document