DOJ-OGR-00018438.jpg

462 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 462 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022, showing the cross-examination of a witness named Kate. The questioning focuses on her involvement in an embarrassing event that was reported in the paper, an alleged payment of £40,000 which she denies receiving, and a recorded conversation she had with a male acquaintance about obtaining drugs that was publicized in a British tabloid.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Kate Witness
Subject of a cross-examination regarding her involvement in an embarrassing event, a potential payment, and a convers...
MS. POMERANTZ Attorney
Making objections during the cross-examination of Kate.
THE COURT Judge
Sustaining objections made by Ms. Pomerantz.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. Company
Listed as the court reporting agency at the bottom of the document.

Timeline (2 events)

2022-08-10
Cross-examination of witness Kate regarding her involvement in a publicized scandal.
Courtroom (implied)
Kate MS. POMERANTZ THE COURT Unnamed Questioner
A recorded conversation between Kate and an acquaintance about drugs was publicized in a British tabloid, which Kate found embarrassing.
Kate unnamed male acquaintance

Relationships (1)

Kate Acquaintance unnamed male acquaintance
The transcript describes Kate having a conversation with a male acquaintance ('him') where she asked him to get her drugs.

Key Quotes (4)

"And you were paid approximately £40,000 for your involvement in that, weren't you?"
Source
— Questioner (Q) (Questioning the witness, Kate, about receiving payment for her involvement in a past event.)
DOJ-OGR-00018438.jpg
Quote #1
"I wasn't paid anything."
Source
— Witness (A) (Kate's response, denying that she was paid.)
DOJ-OGR-00018438.jpg
Quote #2
"Did you have a conversation with him asking him to get you drugs?"
Source
— Questioner (Q) (Asking Kate about a specific conversation with a male acquaintance.)
DOJ-OGR-00018438.jpg
Quote #3
"And was that conversation and the circumstances surrounding that publicized in a British tabloid?"
Source
— Questioner (Q) (Asking if the conversation about drugs was made public.)
DOJ-OGR-00018438.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,031 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 751 Filed 08/10/22 Page 101 of 261 1262
LC6Cmax3 Kate - cross
1 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.
2 THE COURT: Sustained.
3 Q. Well, you were embroiled in that, as well. Your name got
4 in the paper about it, didn't it?
5 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection.
6 THE COURT: Sustained.
7 Q. Was that an embarrassing experience for you?
8 A. Yes.
9 Q. And you were paid approximately £40,000 for your
10 involvement in that, weren't you?
11 A. I wasn't paid anything.
12 Q. You just did it for free?
13 A. Did what?
14 Q. Embroiled that acquaintance in a drug scandal?
15 MS. POMERANTZ: Objection to form.
16 THE COURT: Sustained.
17 Q. Did you have a conversation with him asking him to get you
18 drugs?
19 A. Yes.
20 Q. Was that conversation recorded?
21 A. I believe so.
22 Q. And was that conversation and the circumstances surrounding
23 that publicized in a British tabloid?
24 A. Yes.
25 Q. And as you said, it was embarrassing for you; correct?
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018438

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document