DOJ-OGR-00017764.jpg
616 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
4
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
616 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, capturing a legal argument between attorneys Ms. Moe and Ms. Menninger before a judge. The discussion centers on whether Ms. Menninger can question a witness, Jane, about her potential expectation of receiving a higher financial payout in a related civil case as a result of her testimony in the current criminal proceeding. The attorneys and the court explore the relevance of this line of questioning, touching upon privileged communications and the timeline of a victims' compensation fund.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane | Witness |
Mentioned in the header as the subject of a cross-examination.
|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
An attorney speaking to the court, discussing notes from a conversation with Mr. Glassman and privilege issues.
|
| Mr. Glassman | Attorney |
Mentioned as someone Ms. Moe had a conversation with and who gave initial advice to the witness.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Attorney |
An attorney questioning the witness and explaining the relevance of her questions to the court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Presiding over the legal proceeding, asking clarifying questions to the attorneys.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript, likely the court reporting agency.
|
| government | Government agency |
Mentioned in the context of a communication between an attorney and the government.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion during a court proceeding regarding the cross-examination of a witness named Jane.
The witness received initial advice from Mr. Glassman before a victims' compensation fund was established.
Relationships (2)
The document states that the witness received 'her initial advice from Mr. Glassman'.
The two attorneys are on opposing sides in a court proceeding, arguing before a judge about the scope of questioning.
Key Quotes (4)
"In our view, my notes about a conversation with someone who's not this witness can't be an exhibit at the trial."Source
— MS. MOE
(Arguing against the admissibility of her notes regarding a conversation with Mr. Glassman.)
DOJ-OGR-00017764.jpg
Quote #1
"Your Honor, the underlying question is she expected to get a higher payout in her civil case if she testified in and cooperated in this criminal case."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Explaining the purpose and relevance of her line of questioning to the court.)
DOJ-OGR-00017764.jpg
Quote #2
"Did she have any basis to believe that by testifying in this criminal case, it would aid the payment she would get in the -- with respect to the fund or the civil case?"Source
— THE COURT
(Clarifying the core issue being debated by the attorneys.)
DOJ-OGR-00017764.jpg
Quote #3
"But at the time her initial advice from Mr. Glassman came in, there was not a victims' compensation fund. That arose during the course of her civil case."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Providing context about the timeline of the witness's civil case and the establishment of a victims' fund.)
DOJ-OGR-00017764.jpg
Quote #4
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,564 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 745 Filed 08/10/22 Page 155 of 264
LC1VMAX5
Jane - cross
566
1 nonprivileged communication, right, between the attorney and
2 the witness's attorney and the government.
3 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. That is my note to file
4 about a conversation with Mr. Glassman. In our view, my notes
5 about a conversation with someone who's not this witness can't
6 be an exhibit at the trial. There are separate questions about
7 her conversations with her attorneys that implicates other
8 privilege issues.
9 THE COURT: You don't have any objection to
10 Ms. Menninger asking the witness if she has any awareness of
11 her participation in this criminal proceeding impacting -- what
12 is the underlying question? Let me just get the underlying
13 question before we get -- Ms. Menninger.
14 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, the underlying question is
15 she expected to get a higher payout in her civil case if she
16 testified in and cooperated in this criminal case. That's the
17 ultimate underlying issue.
18 THE COURT: Did she have any basis to believe that by
19 testifying in this criminal case, it would aid the payment she
20 would get in the -- with respect to the fund or the civil case?
21 MS. MENNINGER: Well, they ultimately became as one.
22 But at the time her initial advice from Mr. Glassman came in,
23 there was not a victims' compensation fund. That arose during
24 the course of her civil case. And so --
25 THE COURT: And the line you're interested in is that
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017764
LC1VMAX5
Jane - cross
566
1 nonprivileged communication, right, between the attorney and
2 the witness's attorney and the government.
3 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor. That is my note to file
4 about a conversation with Mr. Glassman. In our view, my notes
5 about a conversation with someone who's not this witness can't
6 be an exhibit at the trial. There are separate questions about
7 her conversations with her attorneys that implicates other
8 privilege issues.
9 THE COURT: You don't have any objection to
10 Ms. Menninger asking the witness if she has any awareness of
11 her participation in this criminal proceeding impacting -- what
12 is the underlying question? Let me just get the underlying
13 question before we get -- Ms. Menninger.
14 MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, the underlying question is
15 she expected to get a higher payout in her civil case if she
16 testified in and cooperated in this criminal case. That's the
17 ultimate underlying issue.
18 THE COURT: Did she have any basis to believe that by
19 testifying in this criminal case, it would aid the payment she
20 would get in the -- with respect to the fund or the civil case?
21 MS. MENNINGER: Well, they ultimately became as one.
22 But at the time her initial advice from Mr. Glassman came in,
23 there was not a victims' compensation fund. That arose during
24 the course of her civil case. And so --
25 THE COURT: And the line you're interested in is that
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017764
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document