DOJ-OGR-00001107.jpg

671 KB

Extraction Summary

2
People
3
Organizations
3
Locations
3
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 671 KB
Summary

This legal document argues for Ms. Maxwell to be released on restrictive bail. Her defense contends that the government's case lacks corroborating evidence, relies on old testimony, and that her oppressive confinement conditions at the MDC, including a COVID-19 outbreak, are unjust and impede her ability to prepare her defense. The filing also asserts she is not a flight risk, citing expert opinions on extradition from the UK and France.

People (2)

Name Role Context
Ms. Maxwell Defendant
The central figure of the document, who is detained and for whom bail is being sought. The arguments concern her flig...
Epstein
Mentioned in the context of a spike in media articles attacking Ms. Maxwell.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
The government Government agency
The prosecuting party in the case against Ms. Maxwell, accused of having a weak, uncorroborated case.
The Court Judicial body
The judicial body to which the government has presented its case and before which this motion is being argued.
MDC Detention facility
The facility where Ms. Maxwell is being detained, where a COVID-19 outbreak is mentioned, and where her lawyers have ...

Timeline (3 events)

2020-07-02
Ms. Maxwell was indicted and arrested.
2020-07-02
Ms. Maxwell has been detained for over 150 days in conditions equivalent to solitary confinement.
MDC
A recent COVID-19 outbreak occurred at the MDC, threatening Ms. Maxwell's safety.
MDC

Locations (3)

Location Context
Mentioned as a country from which Ms. Maxwell would be unable to resist extradition.
Mentioned as a country from which Ms. Maxwell would be unable to resist extradition.
MDC
The location of Ms. Maxwell's confinement.

Relationships (2)

Ms. Maxwell Adversarial (Legal) The government
The document is a legal filing outlining arguments against the government's case and its treatment of Ms. Maxwell as a defendant.
Ms. Maxwell Associates (subject of media attention) Epstein
The document states that a "deluge of media articles" attacking Ms. Maxwell "spiked over a year ago when Epstein...", indicating a publicly perceived connection.

Key Quotes (2)

"contemporaneous documents"
Source
— The government (A phrase used by the government to describe the evidence it claimed to possess in support of its case against Ms. Maxwell.)
DOJ-OGR-00001107.jpg
Quote #1
"diary entries"
Source
— The government (A specific example of the "contemporaneous documents" the government claimed to have as evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00001107.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (3,032 characters)

Case 20-cr-00330-AJN Document 202 Filed 06/25/20 Page 166 of 2045
contest extradition in both the United Kingdom and France.² We also provide opinions from experts in the extradition laws of the France and the United Kingdom stating that it is highly unlikely that Ms. Maxwell would be able to resist extradition from either country in the event she were granted bail and somehow fled to either country, which she has no intention of doing. Their opinions also state that any extradition proceeding would be resolved promptly. (Exs. T-V).
• Lack of corroborating evidence. The government represented to the Court that it had “contemporaneous documents,” including “diary entries” in support of its case. (Dkt. 4 at 5). The defense has now reviewed the discovery produced to date, including all of the documents that the government described as the core of its case against Ms. Maxwell. As explained more fully below, the discovery contains no meaningful documentary corroboration as to Maxwell and only a small number of documents from the time period of the conspiracy charged in the indictment. As an example, the government produced only [REDACTED].³
The evidence in this case boils down to witness testimony about events that took place over 25 years ago. Far from creating a flight risk, the lack of corroboration only reinforces Ms. Maxwell’s conviction that she has been falsely accused and strengthens her long-standing desire to face the allegations against her and clear her name in court.
• Oppressive conditions of confinement. Ms. Maxwell has now been detained for over 150 days in the equivalent of solitary confinement since she was indicted and arrested on July 2, 2020, despite the fact that she is not a suicide risk and has not received a single disciplinary infraction. The draconian conditions to which Ms. Maxwell is subjected are not only unjust and punitive, but also impair her ability to review the voluminous discovery produced by the government and to participate meaningfully in the preparation of her defense. Furthermore, the recent COVID-19 outbreak at the MDC threatens her safety and well-being.
Ms. Maxwell Should Be Placed on Restrictive Bail Conditions
During her more than five months in isolation, Ms. Maxwell has had to watch as she has been relentlessly attacked in a deluge of media articles that spiked over a year ago when Epstein
² Ms. Maxwell has not yet signed these waivers because we have not been able to visit her in the MDC to obtain her signature since she was quarantined over two weeks ago. She will sign them as soon as legal visits resume.
³ In a letter dated October 13, 2020, we asked the government to provide additional discovery including, among other things, [REDACTED]. In light of the serious Brady infractions in recent cases before this Court, and the recent order filed in this case pursuant to Rule 5(F) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (see Dkt. 68), the government’s failure to obtain [REDACTED] is curious and concerning.
5
DOJ-OGR-00001107

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document