This document is the concluding page of a legal motion (Document 33, Case 1:19-cr-00830-AT) filed on April 9, 2020. Attorney Montell Figgins, representing defendant Michael Thomas, requests that the court grant their Motion to Compel, arguing that requested reports are subject to Brady disclosure and should be produced within 45 days of the court's order.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Edwards |
Mentioned in a case citation: United States v. Edwards, 191 F. Supp. 2d. 88, 90 (D.D.C. 2002).
|
|
| Brady |
Referenced in the context of the 'conscripts of Brady', referring to the Brady disclosure rule from Brady v. Maryland.
|
|
| Thomas | Defendant |
Mentioned as the defendant in the sentence 'The Motion to Compel of defendant, Thomas, should be granted...'
|
| Montell Figgins | Esquire, Attorney for Defendant, Michael Thomas |
Signed the document as the attorney for the defendant.
|
| Michael Thomas | Defendant |
Identified in the signature block as the defendant represented by Montell Figgins.
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| The Law Offices of Montell Figgins, LLC | Law firm |
Listed in the signature block as the law firm of the attorney Montell Figgins.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Abbreviation for the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, mentioned in a case citation.
|
|
|
The address of The Law Offices of Montell Figgins, LLC.
|
|
|
The city and state of the law firm's address.
|
"The Motion to Compel of defendant, Thomas, should be granted, and this Court should order the production of documents within forty-five (45) days from the date of the Order."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (748 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document