DOJ-OGR-00014564.jpg
649 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
1
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
649 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a prosecutor's (Ms. Comey) rebuttal in a criminal trial, filed on August 10, 2022. The prosecutor argues that the defendant was knowingly complicit in a sexual abuse scheme, citing a list of masseuses, a Palm Beach house, and a $30 million payment characterized as 'we-molested-kids-together money'. The prosecutor urges the jury to focus on the powerful testimony of victims like Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie, and dismisses the defense's arguments about missing evidence as a distraction.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Ms. Comey | Speaker (likely prosecutor) |
Mentioned in the header as the speaker for the rebuttal.
|
| Jane | Witness/Victim |
Mentioned as one of the girls who gave powerful testimony during the trial.
|
| Carolyn | Witness/Victim |
Mentioned as one of the girls who gave powerful testimony during the trial.
|
| Annie | Witness/Victim |
Mentioned as one of the girls who gave powerful testimony during the trial.
|
| Virginia Roberts | Victim |
Mentioned as one of the girls targeted by an unnamed male.
|
| Kate | Witness/Victim |
Mentioned as one of the individuals who gave powerful testimony during the trial.
|
| Ms. Menninger | Defense counsel (implied) |
Mentioned as having talked about the absence of photographs or hard drives as evidence.
|
| Judge Nathan | Judge |
The speaker expects Judge Nathan to provide specific instructions to the jury.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
A criminal trial where testimony was heard from Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie.
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Described as a house filled with sexualized photos of girls and where a massage table was kept.
|
Relationships (2)
The defendant
→
Criminal conspiracy
→
Unnamed 'he'
The document alleges the defendant was a 'crucial part of this scheme' and was 'complicit' in the unnamed male's sexual abuse of girls, for which she received $30 million.
Unnamed 'he'
→
Abuser-Victim
→
Jane, Carolyn, Annie, Virginia Roberts
The document states 'he was doing it because he was attracted to them, because he wanted to have sex with them.'
Key Quotes (1)
"That $30 million is not just house-manager, hold-my-money-for-me money, it is, we-molested-kids-together money."Source
— Ms. Comey
(The speaker is characterizing a $30 million payment to the defendant as money for complicity in a sexual abuse scheme.)
DOJ-OGR-00014564.jpg
Quote #1
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,668 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 767 Filed 08/10/22 Page 164 of 257 2998
LCKCmax7
Rebuttal - Ms. Comey
LCKCmax7
Rebuttal - Ms. Comey
1 girls like Jane, like Carolyn, like Annie, like Virginia
2 Roberts, she knew that he was doing it because he was attracted
3 to them, because he wanted to have sex with them. The
4 suggestion that she didn't know borders on the absurd.
5 Think about that Palm Beach house filled with
6 sexualized photos of girls around his desk, in the bedroom, in
7 the closet where the massage table was kept, and think about
8 that list of masseuses. Who needs that many masseuses? You
9 saw that list from Government Exhibit 52-G. And who needs that
10 many massages? Those were so obviously a ruse for sex. The
11 defendant clearly knew what was going on, and she was
12 complicit. She was in the room. So of course she knew. That
13 $30 million is not just house-manager, hold-my-money-for-me
14 money, it is, we-molested-kids-together money. The defendant
15 was a crucial part of this scheme.
16 Now the defense talked a lot about what you don't have
17 here, what's not in evidence in this case. See that for what
18 it is, a distraction. It's a desperate attempt to get you to
19 think about anything other than the powerful testimony you
20 heard during this trial from Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie.
21 Just a few points on this particular argument.
22 First, Ms. Menninger talked a lot about where are the
23 photographs or where are the hard drives. I expect that Judge
24 Nathan is going to instruct you that the government is not
25 required to use any particular investigative techniques. What
2 Roberts, she knew that he was doing it because he was attracted
3 to them, because he wanted to have sex with them. The
4 suggestion that she didn't know borders on the absurd.
5 Think about that Palm Beach house filled with
6 sexualized photos of girls around his desk, in the bedroom, in
7 the closet where the massage table was kept, and think about
8 that list of masseuses. Who needs that many masseuses? You
9 saw that list from Government Exhibit 52-G. And who needs that
10 many massages? Those were so obviously a ruse for sex. The
11 defendant clearly knew what was going on, and she was
12 complicit. She was in the room. So of course she knew. That
13 $30 million is not just house-manager, hold-my-money-for-me
14 money, it is, we-molested-kids-together money. The defendant
15 was a crucial part of this scheme.
16 Now the defense talked a lot about what you don't have
17 here, what's not in evidence in this case. See that for what
18 it is, a distraction. It's a desperate attempt to get you to
19 think about anything other than the powerful testimony you
20 heard during this trial from Jane, Kate, Carolyn, and Annie.
21 Just a few points on this particular argument.
22 First, Ms. Menninger talked a lot about where are the
23 photographs or where are the hard drives. I expect that Judge
24 Nathan is going to instruct you that the government is not
25 required to use any particular investigative techniques. What
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014564
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document