DOJ-OGR-00020760.jpg

608 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
3
Organizations
1
Locations
4
Events
2
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Court opinion & order
File Size: 608 KB
Summary

This is an Opinion & Order filed on April 16, 2021, by District Judge Alison J. Nathan in the case of United States v. Ghislaine Maxwell. The document outlines the procedural history, including the initial June 2020 indictment and subsequent superseding indictments regarding charges of facilitating Jeffrey Epstein's sexual abuse of minors, Mann Act violations, and perjury. The order states it resolves Maxwell's pending pretrial motions regarding the S1 indictment, excluding motions to suppress evidence.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Ghislaine Maxwell Defendant
Charged with facilitating sexual abuse, enticement of minors, conspiracy, and perjury.
Jeffrey Epstein Associate/Financier
Described as 'late financier'; Maxwell accused of facilitating his sexual abuse of minors.
Alison J. Nathan District Judge
Presiding judge issuing the Opinion & Order.

Organizations (3)

Name Type Context
United States District Court Southern District of New York
Venue of the legal proceedings.
United States of America
Prosecuting party.
Department of Justice (DOJ)
implied by footer DOJ-OGR

Timeline (4 events)

1994 to 1997
Timeframe of alleged sexual abuse of minor victims facilitated by Maxwell.
Unspecified
2020-06
Grand jury returned a six-count indictment charging Ghislaine Maxwell.
New York
Ghislaine Maxwell Grand Jury
2021-04-16
Opinion & Order filed electronically.
USDC SDNY
2021-07-12
Scheduled start date for trial.
USDC SDNY

Locations (1)

Location Context
Location of the court.

Relationships (2)

Ghislaine Maxwell Co-conspirator (Alleged) Jeffrey Epstein
Indictment charging Maxwell with facilitating Epstein's sexual abuse of minors.
United States of America Adversarial (Legal) Ghislaine Maxwell
Case caption: United States of America -v- Ghislaine Maxwell

Key Quotes (3)

"In June 2020, a grand jury returned a six-count indictment charging Ghislaine Maxwell with facilitating the late financier Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse of minor victims from around 1994 to 1997."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020760.jpg
Quote #1
"Trial is set to begin on July 12, 2021."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020760.jpg
Quote #2
"This Opinion resolves all of Maxwell’s currently pending pretrial motions other than those seeking to suppress evidence, which the Court will resolve in due course."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00020760.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,683 characters)

Case 22-1426, Document 57, 02/28/2023, 3475900, Page142 of 208
A-138
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 207 Filed 04/16/21 Page 1 of 34
USDC SDNY
DOCUMENT
ELECTRONICALLY FILED
DOC #:
DATE FILED: 4/16/21
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK
United States of America,
-v-
Ghislaine Maxwell,
Defendant.
20-cr-330 (AJN)
OPINION & ORDER
ALISON J. NATHAN, District Judge:
In June 2020, a grand jury returned a six-count indictment charging Ghislaine Maxwell
with facilitating the late financier Jeffrey Epstein’s sexual abuse of minor victims from around
1994 to 1997. The Government filed a first (S1) superseding indictment shortly thereafter,
which contained only small, ministerial corrections. The S1 superseding indictment included
two counts of enticement or transportation of minors to engage in illegal sex acts in violation of
the Mann Act and two counts of conspiracy to commit those offenses. It also included two
counts of perjury in connection with Maxwell’s testimony in a civil deposition. Trial is set to
begin on July 12, 2021.
Maxwell filed twelve pretrial motions seeking to dismiss portions of the S1 superseding
indictment, suppress evidence, and compel discovery. After the parties fully briefed those
motions, a grand jury returned a second (S2) superseding indictment adding a sex trafficking
count and another related conspiracy count.
This Opinion resolves all of Maxwell’s currently pending pretrial motions other than
those seeking to suppress evidence, which the Court will resolve in due course. The motions, and
this Opinion, deal exclusively with the S1 superseding indictment and do not resolve any issues
DOJ-OGR-00020760

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document