DOJ-OGR-00000208.tif

36 KB

Extraction Summary

0
People
5
Organizations
4
Locations
3
Events
0
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document / court filing excerpt
File Size: 36 KB
Summary

This document, labeled as page 8 of a larger filing (DOJ-OGR-00000208), discusses how the Department of Justice drafts plea agreements with a limited, single-district scope, meaning they typically only bind specific U.S. Attorney's Offices and not the entire Department or other authorities. It provides three examples of such plea agreement language from the Middle District of Alabama, Northern District of Alabama, and Eastern District of California, citing specific court cases and ECF filing numbers with dates in 2023 and 2024.

Organizations (5)

Name Type Context
Department of Justice
Main topic, drafting plea agreements
United States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama
Party bound by plea agreement
United States Department of Justice
Component not bound by Middle District of Alabama agreement
United States Attorney
General reference in Northern District of Alabama context
United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California
Party bound by plea agreement

Timeline (3 events)

2023-02-07
ECF filing for United States v. Amani Investments, No. 2:23-cr-00014-JAM, ECF No. 8
Eastern District of California
2024-11-18
ECF filing for United States v. Giaquinto, No. 2:22-cr-00035-MHH-GMB, ECF No. 326
Northern District of Alabama
2024-12-19
ECF filing for United States v. McIntyre, No. 1:24-cr-00211, ECF No. 33
Middle District of Alabama

Locations (4)

Location Context
Jurisdiction for a plea agreement example
Jurisdiction for a plea agreement example
Jurisdiction for a plea agreement example
Abbreviation for Eastern District of California

Key Quotes (4)

""[s]ingle district plea agreements are the norm.""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000208.tif
Quote #1
""The defendant understands that this agreement binds only the Office of the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Alabama and that the agreement does not bind any other component of the United States Department of Justice, nor does it bind any state or local prosecuting authority.""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000208.tif
Quote #2
""The Defendant understands and agrees that this Agreement does not bind any other United States Attorney in any other district, or any other state or local authority.""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000208.tif
Quote #3
""This plea agreement is limited to the United States Attorney's Office for the Eastern District of California and cannot bind any other federal, state, or local prosecuting, administrative, or regulatory authorities.""
Source
DOJ-OGR-00000208.tif
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,510 characters)

8
2. The Department of Justice knows how to draft plea
agreements to bind only part of the Department in
future prosecutions.
As the trial court correctly noted, "[s]ingle district
plea agreements are the norm." (App. 56a) A survey of
plea agreements from districts across the county reveals
that the Department of Justice routinely drafts plea
agreements with this limited single-district scope.
Here are examples from districts across the country:
Middle District of Alabama: "The defendant
understands that this agreement binds only the Office
of the United States Attorney for the Middle District of
Alabama and that the agreement does not bind any other
component of the United States Department of Justice,
nor does it bind any state or local prosecuting authority."
United States v. McIntyre, No. 1:24-cr-00211, ECF No.
33 (Dec. 19, 2024), at 14.
Northern District of Alabama: "The Defendant
understands and agrees that this Agreement does not bind
any other United States Attorney in any other district,
or any other state or local authority." United States v.
Giaquinto, No. 2:22-cr-00035-MHH-GMB, ECF No. 326
(Nov. 18, 2024), at 13.
Eastern District of California: "This plea agreement
is limited to the United States Attorney's Office for
the Eastern District of California and cannot bind any
other federal, state, or local prosecuting, administrative,
or regulatory authorities." United States v. Amani
Investments, No. 2:23-cr-00014-JAM, ECF No. 8 (E.D.
Cal. Feb. 7, 2023), at 1.
DOJ-OGR-00000208

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document