DOJ-OGR-00016485.jpg
589 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript
File Size:
589 KB
Summary
This court transcript from August 10, 2022, documents a discussion between the judge and Mr. Everdell while the jury is not present. The judge addresses several procedural matters, including a recent order denying the defense's request for witness anonymity and the late receipt of a letter with government objections. They also discuss the scheduling for a witness whose testimony involves prior inconsistent statements, with Mr. Everdell indicating such a witness would not appear until after lunch.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker who is presiding over the trial and discussing procedural issues.
|
| MR. EVERDELL |
Speaker addressing the court regarding witness scheduling and procedural matters.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | Company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
The trial resumed with the jury not present to discuss procedural issues.
Courtroom
Relationships (1)
Mr. Everdell addresses the Court as 'Your Honor' and they are engaged in a formal discussion about the proceedings of a trial, indicating a judge-counsel relationship.
Key Quotes (3)
"I did address the issue of defense witness anonymity by order last night, which will be docketed this morning when docketing puts it up, denying the defense request for anonymity for the reasons indicated."Source
— THE COURT
(Explaining a ruling made the previous night regarding a defense motion.)
DOJ-OGR-00016485.jpg
Quote #1
"I received the letter with the government objections close to 11 p.m. last night."Source
— THE COURT
(Informing the parties about a late submission from the government regarding the prior inconsistent statements issue.)
DOJ-OGR-00016485.jpg
Quote #2
"I don't think we have a witness until after lunch that is going to implicate the prior inconsistent statements."Source
— MR. EVERDELL
(Responding to the Court's question about the timing of witnesses related to a specific evidentiary issue.)
DOJ-OGR-00016485.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,466 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 761 Filed 08/10/22 Page 2 of 246 2297
LCGVMAX1
LCGVMAX1
1
(Trial resumed; jury not present)
2
THE COURT: All right. We have a number of issues to
3
take up. I've gotten letter briefing on several issues over
4
the past few days, including some new issues that came in last
5
night. I did address the issue of defense witness anonymity by
6
order last night, which will be docketed this morning when
7
docketing puts it up, denying the defense request for anonymity
8
for the reasons indicated.
9
As to the remaining issues, so there's the prior
10
inconsistent statements issue. I received the letter with the
11
government objections close to 11 p.m. last night. I haven't
12
had the ability to yet go through all of them, and I haven't
13
heard any responses from the defense.
14
What's the timing of anticipated witnesses here?
15
MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, for the witness order?
16
THE COURT: Well, when might we get to a witness who
17
implicates the prior inconsistent statements? And I gather
18
there's been some effort to work through stipulation and
19
narrowing.
20
MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.
21
There have been some efforts, and I think there's
22
going to be continued efforts there. I don't think we have a
23
witness until after lunch that is going to implicate the prior
24
inconsistent statements.
25
THE COURT: Okay. That may be what we're doing during
(Trial resumed; jury not present)
2
THE COURT: All right. We have a number of issues to
3
take up. I've gotten letter briefing on several issues over
4
the past few days, including some new issues that came in last
5
night. I did address the issue of defense witness anonymity by
6
order last night, which will be docketed this morning when
7
docketing puts it up, denying the defense request for anonymity
8
for the reasons indicated.
9
As to the remaining issues, so there's the prior
10
inconsistent statements issue. I received the letter with the
11
government objections close to 11 p.m. last night. I haven't
12
had the ability to yet go through all of them, and I haven't
13
heard any responses from the defense.
14
What's the timing of anticipated witnesses here?
15
MR. EVERDELL: Your Honor, for the witness order?
16
THE COURT: Well, when might we get to a witness who
17
implicates the prior inconsistent statements? And I gather
18
there's been some effort to work through stipulation and
19
narrowing.
20
MR. EVERDELL: Yes, your Honor.
21
There have been some efforts, and I think there's
22
going to be continued efforts there. I don't think we have a
23
witness until after lunch that is going to implicate the prior
24
inconsistent statements.
25
THE COURT: Okay. That may be what we're doing during
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016485
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document