This document is a transcript of a discussion involving David Markus, Ghislaine Maxwell, and Todd Blanche. The conversation revolves around an enforceable deal, a non-prosecution agreement (NPA), and whether an unnamed individual received a favorable deal from federal authorities, potentially avoiding a longer sentence.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| DAVID MARKUS | Speaker |
Participating in a discussion about an enforceable deal and a non-prosecution agreement.
|
| GHISLAINE MAXWELL | Speaker |
Participating in a discussion about an enforceable deal and a non-prosecution agreement; mentions being included in s...
|
| TODD BLANCHE | Speaker |
Participating in a discussion, expresses reluctance to discuss legal matters on appeal, and asks a question about som...
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MAGNA LEGAL SERVICES |
Appears as a footer/service provider for the document.
|
|
| NPA |
Mentioned in the context of someone being 'enjoined' to it, likely a Non-Prosecution Agreement.
|
|
| feds |
Refers to federal authorities in the context of a sentence or non-prosecution agreement.
|
"DAVID MARKUS: But it's still enforceable as to her."Source
"GHISLAINE MAXWELL: I mean, he never said, hey, do you -- are you happy with this deal like that. But I understood. He never -- he never enjoined me to the NPA, but I understand that he included me, specifically, and I'll tell you why."Source
"TODD BLANCHE: The reason for my question, just to be -- I'm not trying to hide something, but there's a very strong belief that he got a very good deal. And that he should -- she -- he should have been sentenced to more time or got a different sentence from the feds than a non-prosecution agreement."Source
"TODD BLANCHE: And I'm not asking you to opine on that, but I'm wondering whether he ever talked to you about that. But it sounds like he didn't."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,093 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document