This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, from case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE. It captures a discussion between attorneys Ms. Moe and Mr. Everdell and the judge regarding the admissibility of evidence. The key points are the government's intent to use photographs of a massage room rather than the physical table, and Mr. Everdell's argument that costumes found in a 2019 search are irrelevant as they were discovered 15 years after the alleged conspiracy.
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MS. MOE | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, representing the government's position on evidence.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, presiding over the case and asking clarifying questions about evidence.
|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, arguing against the relevance of certain evidence (costumes).
|
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting service.
|
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Location where a search took place in 2019 and costumes were found.
|
|
|
A room within the residence containing a massage table, photographs of which are being offered as evidence.
|
"We'll be offering photographs of the massage room, we're not offering the physical massage table itself."Source
"The last physical item is the costumes themselves, I believe it's a box of five costumes, cosplay costumes that were found in the residence."Source
"Obviously, your Honor, this search took place in 2019, that's 15 years after the last year of the conspiracy charged in this case."Source
Complete text extracted from the document (1,464 characters)
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document