DOJ-OGR-00016879.jpg
610 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
3
Events
3
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
610 KB
Summary
This document is a transcript from a court hearing on August 10, 2022. An attorney, Ms. Moe, clarifies for the record that discovery materials related to an individual named Jane contain very few names (five or fewer), not hundreds. The court then questions another attorney, Ms. Menninger, about the contact information for a witness, who confirms the witness was personally served and given the necessary contact details.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Jane |
Mentioned as a person who recalled other people being present for group sessions. Materials relating to her were prod...
|
|
| Ms. Menninger |
A speaker in the transcript, likely an attorney, who is being questioned by the court and is referenced by Ms. Moe.
|
|
| MS. MOE |
A speaker in the transcript, likely an attorney, who is clarifying the contents of materials produced relating to Jane.
|
|
| THE COURT | Judge/Court |
A speaker in the transcript, presiding over the proceedings and asking questions.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the document, likely the court reporting agency that transcribed the proceedings.
|
Timeline (3 events)
A witness was personally served by a process server and handed contact information.
MS. MENNINGER
process server
witness
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, "SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C."
|
Relationships (3)
They are both participating in a court proceeding, likely as opposing counsel, discussing discovery materials and witnesses.
Ms. Moe is addressing the court to clarify a point for the official record.
Ms. Menninger is responding to direct questions from the court regarding a witness.
Key Quotes (2)
"I just want to make sure the record was clear that in the materials relating to Jane that we produced in October, it's not the case that those materials contain hundreds of names of people. In fact, it was, I want to say, five or fewer."Source
— MS. MOE
(Clarifying for the court the limited number of names contained in discovery materials provided.)
DOJ-OGR-00016879.jpg
Quote #1
"She was served personally by a process server, and with that handover, I believe she was handed the contact information to get in touch with us to be placed on call."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(Explaining to the court how a witness was contacted and provided with information.)
DOJ-OGR-00016879.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,491 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-AJN Document 763 Filed 08/10/22 Page 150 of 197
LCHCmax5
LCHCmax5
people who Jane recalled in particular being present for these
group sessions. I don't know the exact number off the top of
my head, but I think it is just the people who Ms. Menninger
asked about on cross examination and those particular first
names. So I want to make sure the record is clear, that it's
not the case that the 3500 materials had hundreds of names of
people --
group sessions. I don't know the exact number off the top of
my head, but I think it is just the people who Ms. Menninger
asked about on cross examination and those particular first
names. So I want to make sure the record is clear, that it's
not the case that the 3500 materials had hundreds of names of
people --
THE COURT: Can you just give me one second. Sorry.
Go ahead.
Go ahead.
MS. MOE: I just want to make sure the record was
clear that in the materials relating to Jane that we produced
in October, it's not the case that those materials contain
hundreds of names of people. In fact, it was, I want to say,
five or fewer. But Ms. Menninger has those materials and it's
a very narrative scope. So I just want to make sure the record
is clear on that in terms of when the relevance of that would
have become apparent and how specific it was.
clear that in the materials relating to Jane that we produced
in October, it's not the case that those materials contain
hundreds of names of people. In fact, it was, I want to say,
five or fewer. But Ms. Menninger has those materials and it's
a very narrative scope. So I just want to make sure the record
is clear on that in terms of when the relevance of that would
have become apparent and how specific it was.
THE COURT: And the address or contact information
that you used to try to contact this witness, do you have any
basis -- what is the basis to the current contact information?
that you used to try to contact this witness, do you have any
basis -- what is the basis to the current contact information?
MS. MENNINGER: She was served personally by a process
server, and with that handover, I believe she was handed the
contact information to get in touch with us to be placed on
call. We had a standard letter that we gave to all of the
witnesses we've placed on call.
server, and with that handover, I believe she was handed the
contact information to get in touch with us to be placed on
call. We had a standard letter that we gave to all of the
witnesses we've placed on call.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00016879
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document