DOJ-OGR-00017284.jpg
503 KB
Extraction Summary
8
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
3
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
503 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from a case filed on August 10, 2022. It details a conversation between the judge and several individuals, likely attorneys, regarding testimony from 'Carolyn' and 'Special Agent Jason Richards' concerning an exhibit. The discussion concludes with a request for court notes, which the judge agrees to provide after redacting the jury foreperson's signature.
People (8)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn |
Mentioned in the context of her testimony, which is in a transcript.
|
|
| MS. COMEY |
A speaker in the transcript, likely an attorney, who agrees with the court.
|
|
| MR. PAGLIUCA |
A speaker in the transcript, likely an attorney, who agrees with the court and later raises an issue about testimony ...
|
|
| Special Agent Jason Richards | Special Agent |
Mentioned by Mr. Pagliuca as having provided testimony regarding an exhibit.
|
| MS. STERNHEIM |
A speaker in the transcript, likely an attorney, who requests copies of court exhibits (notes).
|
|
| Judge | Judge |
Addressed by Ms. Sternheim. This is the same individual as 'THE COURT'.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
A speaker in the transcript who presides over the proceedings.
|
| foreperson | Jury Foreperson |
Mentioned by the Court as having signed their name on notes that need to be redacted.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the page, likely the court reporting service that created the transcript.
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
A discussion during a court hearing about testimony related to exhibit 3505-005 and a request for copies of court notes, which require redaction.
Courtroom in the Southern District
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by the name of the court reporting agency, referring to a U.S. Federal Judicial District.
|
Relationships (3)
Ms. Comey addresses the court as 'your Honor' and responds to the court's questions in a formal legal proceeding.
Mr. Pagliuca addresses the court as 'your Honor' and engages in dialogue about court procedure and evidence.
Ms. Sternheim addresses the court as 'Judge' and makes a formal request for court exhibits.
Key Quotes (3)
"After the Court left and I thought about it, there's other testimony regarding this exhibit, specifically from Special Agent Jason Richards."Source
— MR. PAGLIUCA
(Explaining the need to revisit an issue concerning an exhibit and related testimony.)
DOJ-OGR-00017284.jpg
Quote #1
"Judge, may we receive copies of the court exhibits please?"Source
— MS. STERNHEIM
(Formally requesting documents from the court during the proceeding.)
DOJ-OGR-00017284.jpg
Quote #2
"They need to be redacted because the foreperson has signed their name."Source
— THE COURT
(Providing the reason why the requested notes cannot be immediately provided and must be altered first.)
DOJ-OGR-00017284.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,161 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 769 Filed 08/10/22 Page 6 of 19 3097
LCLVMAXT
LCLVMAXT
1 exhibit. The testimony regarding 3505-005 is in the transcript
2 you have regarding Carolyn's testimony.
3 Agreed?
4 MS. COMEY: Yes. Thank you, your Honor.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Agreed.
6 THE COURT: Thank you.
7 All right. I will do that.
8 And we'll wait to hear further.
9 (Recess pending verdict)
10 THE COURT: I'm told that you requested I return.
11 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. Thank you, your Honor.
12 After the Court left and I thought about it, there's
13 other testimony regarding this exhibit, specifically from
14 Special Agent Jason Richards. We all can't agree on what was
15 in the note, and it may be important for us to hear exactly
16 what was in the note again before we have some consensus on
17 this.
18 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, may we receive copies of the
19 court exhibits please?
20 THE COURT: You mean the notes?
21 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes.
22 THE COURT: They need to be redacted because the
23 foreperson has signed their name.
24 MS. STERNHEIM: Understood.
25 MR. PAGLIUCA: My request is going to be that in
2 you have regarding Carolyn's testimony.
3 Agreed?
4 MS. COMEY: Yes. Thank you, your Honor.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: Agreed.
6 THE COURT: Thank you.
7 All right. I will do that.
8 And we'll wait to hear further.
9 (Recess pending verdict)
10 THE COURT: I'm told that you requested I return.
11 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes. Thank you, your Honor.
12 After the Court left and I thought about it, there's
13 other testimony regarding this exhibit, specifically from
14 Special Agent Jason Richards. We all can't agree on what was
15 in the note, and it may be important for us to hear exactly
16 what was in the note again before we have some consensus on
17 this.
18 MS. STERNHEIM: Judge, may we receive copies of the
19 court exhibits please?
20 THE COURT: You mean the notes?
21 MS. STERNHEIM: Yes.
22 THE COURT: They need to be redacted because the
23 foreperson has signed their name.
24 MS. STERNHEIM: Understood.
25 MR. PAGLIUCA: My request is going to be that in
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00017284
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document