EFTA00036617.pdf
75.1 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
4
Organizations
2
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Email thread
File Size:
75.1 KB
Summary
This document contains an email thread from August 15-16, 2019, between Bureau of Prisons officials, including the Northeast Regional Director. The discussion centers on a draft report concerning Jeffrey Epstein ('Epstein Draft'), specifically regarding staffing levels and overtime (OT) at MCC New York. The Regional Director highlights that approximately 15 officers were sent on Temporary Duty (TDY) to MCC NYM during a 30-day period and suggests including this information to show the agency provided relief to regular staff.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| J. [Redacted] | Regional Director |
Northeast Region (likely BOP); Author of the top email instructing to send TDY info.
|
| Officers | TDY Staff |
Approximately 15 officers from other locations sent TDY to MCC NYM.
|
Organizations (4)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Northeast Region |
Regional office of the bureau.
|
|
| MCC NYM |
Metropolitan Correctional Center New York; facility where Epstein was held and where staffing issues are discussed.
|
|
| Verizon |
Service provider mentioned in email footers.
|
|
| Samsung |
Device manufacturer mentioned in email footers.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2019-08-16
Internal discussion regarding the 'Epstein Draft' report and staffing data.
Email
Regional Director
BOP Staff
Unspecified 30 day period prior to Aug 2019
Deployment of approximately 15 Officers from other locations TDY (Temporary Duty) to MCC NYM.
MCC NYM
15 Officers
MCC NYM Staff
Locations (2)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Correctional facility in New York.
|
|
|
Jurisdictional region.
|
Relationships (1)
Regional Director
→
Professional/Supervisory
→
[Redacted] Recipient
Director giving instructions to send info to another party.
Key Quotes (5)
"Just send the previous TDY info directly to [Redacted] and you can discuss with him if he needs more specifics."Source
EFTA00036617.pdf
Quote #1
"My question would be, were they there to be an addition to the number of available staff or did they have a special purpose?"Source
EFTA00036617.pdf
Quote #2
"But it will show relief was provided by the agency to head off potential overtime fatigue by regular MCC staff."Source
EFTA00036617.pdf
Quote #3
"During a 30 day portion of that time we had approximately 15 Officers from other locations TDY to MCC NYM"Source
EFTA00036617.pdf
Quote #4
"Would it help if we provided that information to show there were additional staff available and the OT was not performed by the current Corr Svc compliment?"Source
EFTA00036617.pdf
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (2,673 characters)
From: "[REDACTED]" <[REDACTED]>
To: "[REDACTED]" <[REDACTED]>, "[REDACTED]"
<[REDACTED]>
Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Epstein Draft
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 15:01:49 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: TEXT.htm; [REDACTED]
To: "[REDACTED]" <[REDACTED]>, "[REDACTED]"
<[REDACTED]>
Subject: Fwd: Fwd: Epstein Draft
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2019 15:01:49 +0000
Importance: Normal
Attachments: TEXT.htm; [REDACTED]
[REDACTED] - See below. Just send the previous TDY info directly to [REDACTED] and you can discuss with him if he needs more
specifics. Thanks
specifics. Thanks
J. [REDACTED]
Regional Director
Northeast Region
[REDACTED]
Regional Director
Northeast Region
[REDACTED]
>>> [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]> 8/16/2019 10:58 AM >>>
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Date: 8/16/19 10:53 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Epstein Draft
From: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Date: 8/16/19 10:53 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Epstein Draft
>>> "[REDACTED]" 08/16/2019 10:44 >>>
If they give us the date range we can make a notation of that fact. My question would be, were they there to be an addition
to the number of available staff or did they have a special purpose? If they were basically additional officers, then the overti
me use will show that even with additional people they keep having shortages. But it will show relief was provided by the ag
ency to head off potential overtime fatigue by regular MCC staff. Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>>> "[REDACTED]" <[REDACTED]> 08/16/2019 10:32 >>>
Sure, thanks.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
>>> "[REDACTED]" <[REDACTED]> 08/16/2019 09:41 >>>
[REDACTED] -
Great report. Appreciate the help. Quick question; page 15 breaks down the OT occurrences over a period of time. During
a 30 day portion of that time we had approximately 15 Officers from other locations TDY to MCC NYM, and much of that OT
If they give us the date range we can make a notation of that fact. My question would be, were they there to be an addition
to the number of available staff or did they have a special purpose? If they were basically additional officers, then the overti
me use will show that even with additional people they keep having shortages. But it will show relief was provided by the ag
ency to head off potential overtime fatigue by regular MCC staff. Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message --------
From: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Date: 8/16/19 9:32 AM (GMT-06:00)
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Epstein Draft
>>> "[REDACTED]" <[REDACTED]> 08/16/2019 10:32 >>>
Sure, thanks.Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
Original message --------
From: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Date: 8/16/19 9:50 AM (GMT-05:00)
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Subject: Re: Fwd: Epstein Draft
>>> "[REDACTED]" <[REDACTED]> 08/16/2019 09:41 >>>
[REDACTED] -
Great report. Appreciate the help. Quick question; page 15 breaks down the OT occurrences over a period of time. During
a 30 day portion of that time we had approximately 15 Officers from other locations TDY to MCC NYM, and much of that OT
EFTA00036617
was provided by those staff. Would it help if we provided that information to show there were additional staff available and t
he OT was not performed by the current Corr Svc compliment?
he OT was not performed by the current Corr Svc compliment?
[REDACTED]
Regional Director
Northeast Region
[REDACTED]
Regional Director
Northeast Region
[REDACTED]
>>> [REDACTED] 8/15/2019 8:19 PM >>>
Sent from my Verizon, Samsung Galaxy smartphone
-------- Original message --------
From: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Date: 8/15/19 4:17 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: Epstein Draft
From: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Date: 8/15/19 4:17 PM (GMT-05:00)
To: [REDACTED] <[REDACTED]>
Cc: [REDACTED]
Subject: Epstein Draft
EFTA00036618
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document