DOJ-OGR-00009048.jpg
586 KB
Extraction Summary
2
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
2
Events
1
Relationships
5
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
586 KB
Summary
This legal document argues that 'Juror No. 50' is not credible. It cites a nonsensical explanation the juror gave to a Daily Mail reporter for a false answer on a questionnaire. The document further refutes the juror's claim that he 'flew through' the questionnaire by highlighting the Court's explicit instructions for careful and truthful completion.
People (2)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Juror No. 50 | Juror |
The subject of the document, whose credibility is being questioned regarding his answers on a juror questionnaire and...
|
| Daily Mail reporter | Reporter |
Told Juror No. 50 about Question 48, prompting a response from the juror.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Daily Mail | company |
A reporter from this organization spoke with Juror No. 50.
|
| The Court | government agency |
Provided instructions for the juror questionnaire and was mentioned as a party that would know jurors' identities and...
|
Timeline (2 events)
A Daily Mail reporter questioned Juror No. 50 about his answer to Question 48 on a questionnaire.
Juror No. 50 completed a juror questionnaire, which he later claimed to have 'flew through'.
Relationships (1)
The Court provided instructions to Juror No. 50 (and other potential jurors) on how to complete a questionnaire and assured them of privacy.
Key Quotes (5)
"Interesting"Source
— Juror No. 50
(Said while struggling for an explanation after being told about Question 48 by a reporter.)
DOJ-OGR-00009048.jpg
Quote #1
"No, No! I know my face is red because I can feel the blood but, I honestly—that’s why I answered it that way."Source
— Juror No. 50
(A nonsensical response given to explain away a false answer on the questionnaire.)
DOJ-OGR-00009048.jpg
Quote #2
"flew through"Source
— Juror No. 50
(The juror's claim about how he completed the questionnaire, used to justify a false answer.)
DOJ-OGR-00009048.jpg
Quote #3
"carefully"Source
— The Court (via questionnaire instructions)
(An instruction given to potential jurors on how to complete the questionnaire.)
DOJ-OGR-00009048.jpg
Quote #4
"only truthful answers"Source
— The Court (via questionnaire instructions)
(An instruction advising jurors that there were no 'right or wrong' answers, but that answers should be truthful.)
DOJ-OGR-00009048.jpg
Quote #5
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,444 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 613 Filed 02/24/22 Page 47 of 66
turned red, and he grasped for words when the Daily Mail reporter told him about
Question 48. “Interesting,” Juror No. 50 said, struggling for an explanation. Unable to
credibly explain away his false answer, Juror No. 50 eventually put together a
nonsensical response: “No, No! I know my face is red because I can feel the blood but, I
honestly—that’s why I answered it that way.”
Question 48. “Interesting,” Juror No. 50 said, struggling for an explanation. Unable to
credibly explain away his false answer, Juror No. 50 eventually put together a
nonsensical response: “No, No! I know my face is red because I can feel the blood but, I
honestly—that’s why I answered it that way.”
Second, Juror No. 50’s attempt to justify his false answer by claiming he “flew
through” the questionnaire is not worthy of belief. The questionnaire instructed potential
jurors to “carefully” compete it. No time limitation was imposed for completion of the
questionnaire. It emphasized that only the parties and the Court would know the identities
of the jurors. It advised that there are no “right or wrong” answers, “only truthful
answers.” And it assured jurors that their privacy would be respected and that if an
answer to any question was embarrassing or caused the juror particular concern, they
could alert the Court. The Court must presume Juror No. 50 heeded these instructions.
Indeed, there is compelling evidence that Juror No. 50 carefully followed these
instructions and did not “fly through” the questionnaire, as he now claims. [REDACTED]
through” the questionnaire is not worthy of belief. The questionnaire instructed potential
jurors to “carefully” compete it. No time limitation was imposed for completion of the
questionnaire. It emphasized that only the parties and the Court would know the identities
of the jurors. It advised that there are no “right or wrong” answers, “only truthful
answers.” And it assured jurors that their privacy would be respected and that if an
answer to any question was embarrassing or caused the juror particular concern, they
could alert the Court. The Court must presume Juror No. 50 heeded these instructions.
Indeed, there is compelling evidence that Juror No. 50 carefully followed these
instructions and did not “fly through” the questionnaire, as he now claims. [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
Third, it is simply not credible that Juror No. 50 [REDACTED]
[REDACTED]
40
DOJ-OGR-00009048
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document