DOJ-OGR-00010219.jpg

564 KB

Extraction Summary

5
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
3
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 564 KB
Summary

This document is a court transcript from a hearing on March 11, 2022, related to the case of United States v. Maxwell. The judge confirms on the record with Juror 50 and his attorney, Mr. Spodek, that the juror will invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination regarding his answers during jury selection. The court also acknowledges receiving a written application from the government, which is confirmed by government representative Ms. Moe.

People (5)

Name Role Context
Juror 50 Juror
A juror who intends to invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege regarding questions about his responses during jury selec...
Mr. Spodek Attorney
Represents Juror 50 and confirms to the court his client's intention to assert the Fifth Amendment privilege.
Maxwell Defendant
Mentioned as the defendant in the case of United States v. Maxwell.
Ms. Moe Government Representative
Confirms to the court that the government submitted a written application.
THE COURT Judge
The presiding judge in the hearing, questioning the parties on the record.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. company
Listed at the bottom of the page as the court reporting agency.
government government agency
Mentioned as having submitted a written application to the court, represented by Ms. Moe.

Timeline (3 events)

2022-02-24
The court issued an opinion, which is referenced by the judge.
2022-03-11
A hearing where the court confirms Juror 50's intention to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege and acknowledges a written application from the government.
Jury selection process for the case of United States v. Maxwell, during which Juror 50 gave responses that are now the subject of questioning.

Relationships (1)

Mr. Spodek professional Juror 50
The court refers to Juror 50 as Mr. Spodek's client ('your client'), establishing an attorney-client relationship.

Key Quotes (3)

"Yes, your Honor."
Source
— MR. SPODEK (Responding to the court's question about whether his client, Juror 50, intends to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege.)
DOJ-OGR-00010219.jpg
Quote #1
"Yes, your Honor."
Source
— JUROR 50 (Directly confirming to the court his intention to assert his Fifth Amendment privilege.)
DOJ-OGR-00010219.jpg
Quote #2
"Yes, your Honor."
Source
— MS. MOE (Confirming to the court that the government is making the written application mentioned by the judge.)
DOJ-OGR-00010219.jpg
Quote #3

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (1,529 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 645 Filed 03/11/22 Page 4 of 50 4
M38TMAX1
1 Juror 50. In post-verdict press interviews he did not reveal
2 his last name. Consistent with that and my juror anonymity
3 order during trial, I will permit that to continue.
4 I received a letter dated March 1st, 2022 from
5 Mr. Spodek. In that letter, Mr. Spodek, you informed me that
6 Juror 50 would invoke his Fifth Amendment privilege against
7 self-incrimination at this hearing. As you see from my
8 February 24 opinion, Mr. Spodek, I am going to ask Juror 50
9 questions today about responses that he gave during the jury
10 selection process in the case of United States v. Maxwell.
11 Does it remain your client's intention to assert his
12 Fifth Amendment privilege in response to those questions?
13 MR. SPODEK: Yes, your Honor.
14 THE COURT: I'm going to confirm on the record with
15 your client, Mr. Spodek:
16 Juror 50, is it your intention to assert your Fifth
17 Amendment privilege in response to the questions I'm going to
18 ask you today?
19 JUROR 50: Yes, your Honor.
20 THE COURT: All right. I received a written
21 application from the government last night.
22 Ms. Moe, could you confirm that the government is
23 making the application?
24 MS. MOE: Yes, your Honor.
25 THE COURT: In accord with the application, I have
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00010219

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document