DOJ-OGR-00014704.jpg
543 KB
Extraction Summary
5
People
1
Organizations
1
Locations
2
Events
2
Relationships
2
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Legal document
File Size:
543 KB
Summary
This document is a court transcript from August 10, 2022, detailing a conversation between a judge (THE COURT) and two attorneys, Mr. Everdell and Ms. Menninger. They are discussing the legal standard required for a jury to find a defendant guilty of aiding in the transportation of a person named 'Jane' to New Mexico. The central issue is whether the flight must have had a 'significant or motivating purpose' related to illegal sexual activity.
People (5)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| MR. EVERDELL | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, answering questions from the court.
|
| THE COURT | Judge |
Speaker in the court transcript, posing questions to the attorneys.
|
| your Honor | Judge |
A title used by Mr. Everdell and Ms. Menninger to address the judge (THE COURT).
|
| MS. MENNINGER | Attorney |
Speaker in the court transcript, interjecting to answer a question from the court.
|
| Jane |
A person whose flight to New Mexico is the subject of the legal discussion.
|
Organizations (1)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C. | company |
Listed at the bottom of the transcript as the court reporting service.
|
Timeline (2 events)
2022-08-10
A court hearing where legal questions are being discussed between the judge and attorneys.
Courtroom
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Mentioned as the destination of a flight taken by 'Jane' for the purpose of engaging in sexual activity.
|
Relationships (2)
Mr. Everdell is an attorney addressing the judge ('your Honor') in a court proceeding.
Ms. Menninger is an attorney addressing the judge ('your Honor') in a court proceeding.
Key Quotes (2)
"To be found guilty on this count, must the jury conclude that she aided in the transportation of Jane's flight to New Mexico?"Source
— THE COURT
(The judge posing a direct question to clarify the legal standard for the jury.)
DOJ-OGR-00014704.jpg
Quote #1
"It has to be a place for which the travel was a significant or motivating purpose for illegal sexual activity."Source
— MS. MENNINGER
(An attorney's response to the judge's question, defining the necessary purpose of the travel for a guilty verdict.)
DOJ-OGR-00014704.jpg
Quote #2
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (1,264 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 773 Filed 08/10/22 Page 18 of 29 3135
LCRVMAXT
LCRVMAXT
MR. EVERDELL: Right?
The travel back to a place where she is presumably not
engaging in illicit sexual activity, that is not a significant
or motivating purpose for that travel.
THE COURT: You didn't answer my question.
MR. EVERDELL: Maybe I'm confused by the question,
your Honor.
THE COURT: To be found guilty on this count, must the
jury conclude that she aided in the transportation of Jane's
flight to New Mexico?
MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, may I interject myself
into this conversation?
THE COURT: If you answer the question, I would value
it.
MS. MENNINGER: I will.
It has to be a place for which the travel was a
significant or motivating purpose for illegal sexual activity.
In this hypothetical that they've given in this
question, they have a comma in two places. The first place
they have a comma is after the return flight, comma, but not
the flight to New Mexico, where the intent was for Jane to
engage in sexual activity, comma. So they have excluded out
where they're hypothetically claiming that the flight to New
Mexico was the place for which the intent was for Jane to
engage in sexual activity.
The travel back to a place where she is presumably not
engaging in illicit sexual activity, that is not a significant
or motivating purpose for that travel.
THE COURT: You didn't answer my question.
MR. EVERDELL: Maybe I'm confused by the question,
your Honor.
THE COURT: To be found guilty on this count, must the
jury conclude that she aided in the transportation of Jane's
flight to New Mexico?
MS. MENNINGER: Your Honor, may I interject myself
into this conversation?
THE COURT: If you answer the question, I would value
it.
MS. MENNINGER: I will.
It has to be a place for which the travel was a
significant or motivating purpose for illegal sexual activity.
In this hypothetical that they've given in this
question, they have a comma in two places. The first place
they have a comma is after the return flight, comma, but not
the flight to New Mexico, where the intent was for Jane to
engage in sexual activity, comma. So they have excluded out
where they're hypothetically claiming that the flight to New
Mexico was the place for which the intent was for Jane to
engage in sexual activity.
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00014704
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document