DOJ-OGR-00018730.jpg
417 KB
Extraction Summary
4
People
2
Organizations
1
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
3
Quotes
Document Information
Type:
Court transcript (sidebar conference)
File Size:
417 KB
Summary
This document is a page from a court transcript (Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE, filed 08/10/22) detailing a sidebar conference during the direct examination of a witness named Carolyn. Defense attorney Mr. Pagliuca argues that reading only two lines of a prior statement removes necessary context. The Court rules that the witness can read the 'whole thing,' and prosecutor Ms. Comey agrees, coordinating specific line numbers (136, line 23 through line 6) with the defense.
People (4)
| Name | Role | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Carolyn | Witness |
Mentioned in header 'Carolyn - direct', indicating she is the witness currently under direct examination.
|
| Mr. Pagliuca | Defense Attorney |
Speaking at sidebar, raising an objection regarding the context of a statement being read.
|
| The Court | Judge |
Presiding over the sidebar, ruling that 'She can read the whole thing.'
|
| Ms. Comey | Prosecutor |
Speaking at sidebar, agreeing to the court's ruling and clarifying line numbers.
|
Organizations (2)
| Name | Type | Context |
|---|---|---|
| Southern District Reporters, P.C. |
Listed in footer.
|
|
| DOJ |
Implied by footer 'DOJ-OGR' (Department of Justice - Office of Government Relations).
|
Timeline (1 events)
2022-08-10
Sidebar conference during court proceedings regarding the admissibility and reading of a prior consistent statement.
Courtroom (Sidebar)
Locations (1)
| Location | Context |
|---|---|
|
Implied by case number and reporter firm name.
|
Relationships (1)
Debating the scope of text to be read in court.
Key Quotes (3)
"The problem is, when read in context... we're simply just parsing out two lines."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018730.jpg
Quote #1
"She can read the whole thing."Source
DOJ-OGR-00018730.jpg
Quote #2
"This is apparently being offered as purported prior consistent statement?"Source
DOJ-OGR-00018730.jpg
Quote #3
Full Extracted Text
Complete text extracted from the document (896 characters)
Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 753 Filed 08/10/22 Page 132 of 264 1558
LC7Cmax4 Carolyn - direct
LC7Cmax4 Carolyn - direct
1 (At the sidebar)
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: This is apparently being offered as
3 purported prior consistent statement?
4 THE COURT: Right.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: The problem is, when read in context,
6 which really starts at line 20 on the page above and goes
7 through probably line 16 on the next page, we're simply just
8 parsing out two lines.
9 THE COURT: She can read the whole thing.
10 MS. COMEY: That's fine, your Honor.
11 THE COURT: Okay?
12 MR. PAGLIUCA: Okay.
13 MS. COMEY: Starting at which line?
14 MR. PAGLIUCA: I'd say 136, line 23.
15 MS. COMEY: That's an answer.
16 MR. PAGLIUCA: So the question is going to be line 20.
17 MS. COMEY: Line 20 through line 6.
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
19 (Continued on next page)
20
21
22
23
24
25
2 MR. PAGLIUCA: This is apparently being offered as
3 purported prior consistent statement?
4 THE COURT: Right.
5 MR. PAGLIUCA: The problem is, when read in context,
6 which really starts at line 20 on the page above and goes
7 through probably line 16 on the next page, we're simply just
8 parsing out two lines.
9 THE COURT: She can read the whole thing.
10 MS. COMEY: That's fine, your Honor.
11 THE COURT: Okay?
12 MR. PAGLIUCA: Okay.
13 MS. COMEY: Starting at which line?
14 MR. PAGLIUCA: I'd say 136, line 23.
15 MS. COMEY: That's an answer.
16 MR. PAGLIUCA: So the question is going to be line 20.
17 MS. COMEY: Line 20 through line 6.
18 MR. PAGLIUCA: Yes.
19 (Continued on next page)
20
21
22
23
24
25
SOUTHERN DISTRICT REPORTERS, P.C.
(212) 805-0300
(212) 805-0300
DOJ-OGR-00018730
Discussion 0
No comments yet
Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document