DOJ-OGR-00009154.jpg

631 KB

Extraction Summary

3
People
2
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
1
Relationships
4
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal filing (government response/brief)
File Size: 631 KB
Summary

This document is page 35 of a legal filing (Document 615) from the Ghislaine Maxwell trial (Case 1:20-cr-00330), filed on February 24, 2022. It is a Government argument requesting that the Court limit the scope of an upcoming hearing regarding potential misconduct by 'Juror 50' regarding undisclosed history of sexual abuse. The Government argues the Court should conduct the questioning to protect the juror from harassment and that inquiries must be strictly limited to whether the juror lied on Question 48 or Question 25 of the jury questionnaire.

People (3)

Name Role Context
Juror 50 Juror
Subject of a post-trial hearing regarding potential juror misconduct, specifically regarding their history of sexual ...
The Defendant Defendant
Ghislaine Maxwell (implied by Case 1:20-cr-00330); seeking to question Juror 50 regarding potential bias.
The Court Judge/Judiciary
Requested by the Government to conduct the questioning of Juror 50 to prevent harassment.

Organizations (2)

Name Type Context
DOJ
Department of Justice (indicated by Bates stamp DOJ-OGR)
2d Cir.
Second Circuit Court of Appeals (cited in legal precedent)

Timeline (1 events)

Post-Trial (2022)
Proposed Hearing regarding Juror 50
Courtroom (SDNY)

Relationships (1)

The Defendant Adversarial/Legal Juror 50
Defendant seeking to question Juror 50 about improper subjects; questioning bias.

Key Quotes (4)

"First, the subject matter—the juror’s history of sexual abuse—presents a particularly high danger of harassment or embarrassment."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009154.jpg
Quote #1
"The Court should exercise its discretion to supervise the hearing by conducting the questioning itself."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009154.jpg
Quote #2
"Here, the only issues relevant under McDonough are whether Juror 50 intentionally lied in response to Question 48, and whether Juror 50 was actually biased against the defendant."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009154.jpg
Quote #3
"Juror 50 cannot be asked to testify about what was said by any juror (including him) in the jury room, or what his mental process was as a deliberating juror."
Source
DOJ-OGR-00009154.jpg
Quote #4

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (2,390 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 615 Filed 02/24/22 Page 35 of 49
interviewed by the Court; the parties were permitted to propose questions before and during the hearing.”), aff’d, 285 F.3d 158 (2d Cir. 2002).
That course of action is especially appropriate here for several reasons. First, the subject matter—the juror’s history of sexual abuse—presents a particularly high danger of harassment or embarrassment. Second, as noted above, the defendant’s brief is littered with information barred by Rule 606(b), suggesting a real danger she will seek to question Juror 50 about improper and inadmissible subjects. The Court should exercise its discretion to supervise the hearing by conducting the questioning itself.
2. The Scope of the Hearing Should Be Limited
The scope of the hearing should be tightly limited to “only what is absolutely necessary to determine the facts with precision.” Ianniello, 866 F.2d at 544; see also Sun Myung Moon, 718 F.2d at 1234; Gagnon, 282 F. App’x at 40.14 Here, the only issues relevant under McDonough are whether Juror 50 intentionally lied in response to Question 48, and whether Juror 50 was actually biased against the defendant. No other subjects are appropriate for inquiry.15
14 In particular, Juror 50 cannot be asked to testify about what was said by any juror (including him) in the jury room, or what his mental process was as a deliberating juror. He also cannot be asked whether he or any other juror discussed personal experiences with sexual abuse during deliberations. Fed. R. Evid. 606(b); Warger, 574 U.S. at 43-44 (“We hold that Rule 606(b) applies to juror testimony during a proceeding in which a party seeks to secure a new trial on the ground that a juror lied during voir dire.”).
15 For the reasons discussed above, [REDACTED]. Similarly, as discussed above, the defendant has also not met her burden with respect to whether Juror 50 answered Question 25 incorrectly, namely, whether Juror 50 considers himself to be a victim of a crime. However, in the event that Juror 50’s testimony at the hearing regarding Question 48 makes clear that Juror 50 answered Question 25 incorrectly as well, the Government would consent to the Court questioning Juror 50 regarding that question. However, that questioning should be limited in the same manner as discussed throughout with respect to Question 48.
33
DOJ-OGR-00009154

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document