DOJ-OGR-00008616.jpg

307 KB

Extraction Summary

0
People
1
Organizations
0
Locations
1
Events
0
Relationships
2
Quotes

Document Information

Type: Legal document
File Size: 307 KB
Summary

This document is a jury instruction, specifically Instruction No. 56, from a legal case filed on December 18, 2021. It instructs the jury on how to handle redacted evidentiary items, defining 'redacted' and directing them to only consider the visible parts of the evidence without speculating on the reasons for the redactions.

Organizations (1)

Name Type Context
DOJ-OGR Government agency
Appears as a Bates number prefix in the footer of the document (DOJ-OGR-00008616).

Timeline (1 events)

2021-12-18
Document 563 was filed in Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE.

Key Quotes (2)

"“Redacted” means that part of the document has been taken out."
Source
— The Court (implied) (This is the definition of the term 'redacted' provided to the jury as part of Instruction No. 56.)
DOJ-OGR-00008616.jpg
Quote #1
"You are to concern yourself only with the part of the item that has been admitted into evidence, and you should not consider any possible reason for the redactions."
Source
— The Court (implied) (This is the direct instruction to the jury on how they must handle and consider redacted evidence.)
DOJ-OGR-00008616.jpg
Quote #2

Full Extracted Text

Complete text extracted from the document (619 characters)

Case 1:20-cr-00330-PAE Document 563 Filed 12/18/21 Page 78 of 167
1 Instruction No. 56: Redaction Of Evidentiary Items
2 We have, among the exhibits received in evidence, some documents that are redacted.
3 “Redacted” means that part of the document has been taken out. Material may be redacted for any
4 number of reasons, including that it is not relevant to the issues you must decide in this case, among
5 other reasons. You are to concern yourself only with the part of the item that has been admitted
6 into evidence, and you should not consider any possible reason for the redactions.
77
DOJ-OGR-00008616

Discussion 0

Sign in to join the discussion

No comments yet

Be the first to share your thoughts on this epstein document